The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacillus velezensis stimulates resident rhizosphere Pseudomonas stutzeri for plant health through metabolic interactions
Open accessAbstract
Trophic interactions play a central role in driving microbial community assembly and function. In gut or soil ecosystems, successful inoculants are always facilitated by efficient colonization; however, the metabolite exchanges between inoculants and resident bacteria are rarely studied, particularly in the rhizosphere. Here, we used bioinformatic, genetic, transcriptomic, and metabonomic analyses to uncover syntrophic cooperation between inoculant (Bacillus velezensis SQR9) and plant-beneficial indigenous Pseudomonas stutzeri in the cucumber rhizosphere. We found that the synergistic interaction of these two species is highly environmental dependent, the emergence of syntrophic cooperation was only evident in a static nutrient-rich niche, such as pellicle biofilm in addition to the rhizosphere. Our results identified branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) biosynthesis pathways are involved in syntrophic cooperation. Genome-scale metabolic modeling and metabolic profiling also demonstrated metabolic facilitation among the bacterial strains. In addition, biofilm matrix components from Bacillus were essential for the interaction. Importantly, the two-species consortium promoted plant growth and helped plants alleviate salt stress. In summary, we propose a mechanism in which synergic interactions between a biocontrol bacterium and a partner species promote plant health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method
Livak, K. J., & Schmittgen, T. D. (2001) · Methods · doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262 · Cited by 180,860
Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2
Love, M. I., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · Cited by 95,106
A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bio Assays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures
Murashige, T., & Skoog, F. (1962) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x · Cited by 67,392
Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation
Seemann, T. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153 · Cited by 18,818
UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads
Edgar, R. C. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2604 · Cited by 16,707
Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis
Page, A. J., Cummins, C. A., Hunt, M., Wong, V. K., Reuter, S., Holden, M. T. G., Fookes, M., Falush, D., Keane, J. A., & Parkhill, J. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421 · Cited by 5,736
STAMP: statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles
Parks, D. H., Tyson, G. W., Hugenholtz, P., & Beiko, R. G. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu494 · Cited by 4,191
Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria
Lugtenberg, B., & Kamilova, F. (2009) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162918 · Cited by 3,987
Plant–microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health
Trivedi, P., Leach, J. E., Tringe, S. G., Sa, T., & Singh, B. K. (2020) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-020-0412-1 · Cited by 3,904
Mutation of the mouse klotho gene leads to a syndrome resembling ageing
Kuro-o, M., Matsumura, Y., Aizawa, H., Kawaguchi, H., Suga, T., Utsugi, T., Ohyama, Y., Kurabayashi, M., Kaname, T., Kume, E., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/36285 · Cited by 3,837
Cited by
Inoculated microbial consortia perform better than single strains in living soil: A meta-analysis
Liu, X., Mei, S., & Salles, J. F. (2023) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.105011 · Cited by 236
Microbial interactions within beneficial consortia promote soil health
Wu, D., Wang, W., Yao, Y., Li, H., Wang, Q., & Niu, B. (2023) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165801 · Cited by 181
Frenemies of the soil: Bacillus and Pseudomonas interspecies interactions
Lyng, M., & Kovács, Á. T. (2023) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2023.02.003 · Cited by 94
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, X., Xu, Z., Xie, J., Hesselberg-Thomsen, V., Tan, T., Zheng, D., Strube, M. L., Dragoš, A., Shen, Q., Zhang, R., & Kovács, Á. T.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2021-09-30
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 774-787
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W3204157072
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 79
- FWCI
- 30.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacillus velezensis stimulates resident rhizosphere Pseudomonas stutzeri for plant health through metabolic interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41396-021-01125-3
- The paper
- Sun, X., Xu, Z., Xie, J., Hesselberg-Thomsen, V., Tan, T., Zheng, D., Strube, M. L., Dragoš, A., Shen, Q., Zhang, R., & Kovács, Á. T. (2022). Bacillus velezensis stimulates resident rhizosphere Pseudomonas stutzeri for plant health through metabolic interactions. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-021-01125-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.