The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Iturin and Fengycin Families of Lipopeptides Are Key Factors in Antagonism of Bacillus subtilis Toward Podosphaera fusca
Open accessAbstract
Podosphaera fusca is the main causal agent of cucurbit powdery mildew in Spain. Four Bacillus subtilis strains, UMAF6614, UMAF6619, UMAF6639, and UMAF8561, with proven ability to suppress the disease on melon in detached leaf and seedling assays, were subjected to further analyses to elucidate the mode of action involved in their biocontrol performance. Cell-free supernatants showed antifungal activities very close to those previously reported for vegetative cells. Identification of three lipopeptide antibiotics, surfactin, fengycin, and iturin A or bacillomycin, in butanolic extracts from cell-free culture filtrates of these B. subtilis strains pointed out that antibiosis could be a major factor involved in their biocontrol ability. The strong inhibitory effect of purified lipopeptide fractions corresponding to bacillomycin, fengycin, and iturin A on P. fusca conidia germination, as well as the in situ detection of these lipopeptides in bacterial-treated melon leaves, provided interesting evidence of their putative involvement in the antagonistic activity. Those results were definitively supported by site-directed mutagenesis analysis, targeted to suppress the biosynthesis of the different lipopeptides. Taken together, our data have allowed us to conclude that the iturin and fengycin families of lipopep-tides have a major role in the antagonism of B. subtilis toward P. fusca.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Raaijmakers, J. M., De Bruijn, I., Nybroe, O., & Ongena, M. (2010) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00221.x · Cited by 1,131
Bacillus subtilis: A plant-growth promoting rhizobacterium that also impacts biotic stress
Hashem, A., Tabassum, B., & Fathi Abd_Allah, E. (2019) · Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.05.004 · Cited by 962
Biological control of plant pathogens by Bacillus species
Fira, D., Dimkić, I., Berić, T., Lozo, J., & Stanković, S. (2018) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.07.044 · Cited by 917
Bacillus species as versatile weapons for plant pathogens: a review
Shafi, J., Tian, H., & Ji, M. (2017) · Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment · doi:10.1080/13102818.2017.1286950 · Cited by 821
Pérez-García, A., Romero, D., & de Vicente, A. (2011) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2010.12.003 · Cited by 586
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Romero, D., de Vicente, A., Rakotoaly, R. H., Dufour, S. E., Veening, J.-W., Arrebola, E., Cazorla, F. M., Kuipers, O. P., Paquot, M., & Pérez-García, A.
- Venue
- Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
- Publisher
- Scientific Societies
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 430-440
- ISSN
- 0894-0282 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7706
- OpenAlex
- W2147642898
- Cited by
- 662
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Iturin and Fengycin Families of Lipopeptides Are Key Factors in Antagonism of Bacillus subtilis Toward Podosphaera fusca. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1094/mpmi-20-4-0430
- The paper
- Romero, D., de Vicente, A., Rakotoaly, R. H., Dufour, S. E., Veening, J.-W., Arrebola, E., Cazorla, F. M., Kuipers, O. P., Paquot, M., & Pérez-García, A. (2007). The Iturin and Fengycin Families of Lipopeptides Are Key Factors in Antagonism of Bacillus subtilis Toward Podosphaera fusca. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®. https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi-20-4-0430
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.