Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Description of the Colonization of a Gnotobiotic Tomato Rhizosphere by Pseudomonas fluorescens Biocontrol Strain WCS365, Using Scanning Electron Microscopy

Open access
Chin-A-Woeng, Thomas F. C., de Priester, Wessel, van der Bij, Arjan J., Lugtenberg, Ben J. J.·1997·Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®

Abstract

To study colonization of the tomato root system, we previously have described a gnotobiotic quartz sand system, in which seedlings inoculated with one or two bacterial strains were allowed to grow. Here we present a scanning electron microscope description of the colonization of the tomato root system by Pseudomonas fluorescens biocontrol strain WCS365, with emphasis on spatial-temporal colonization patterns, based on an improved scanning electron microscopy procedure. Upon inoculation of the germinated seed, proliferation on the seed coat was observed for 2 to 3 days. Within 1 to 3 days, micro-colonies developed, mainly at the root base. Most micro-colonies were localized in junctions between epidermal root cells, whereas others were found in indented parts of the epidermal surface. Downward to the root tip, only single bacterial cells were found. Colonization progressed down the root, initially as single cells. A semi-transparent film appeared to enclose the root surface and micro-colonies present on the root. After 7 days, micro-colonies had developed at positions where only single cells were observed previously and distribution of the bacteria along the root varied from ≈10 6 CFU per cm of root near the root base to ≈10 2 to 10 3 CFU per cm of root near the root tip. Similar colonization patterns were found for the P. fluorescens biocontrol strains CHA0 and F113, and P. putida strain WCS358, as well as for four species that have repeatedly been isolated from tomato roots from a commercial tomato field near Granada, Spain. In contrast, four Rhizobium strains and one Acinetobacter radioresistens strain showed poor colonization and micro-colonies were not observed. Based on the described data, we present a model for colonization of the deeper root parts after seed inoculation by P. fluorescens biocontrol strains, in which single cells occasionally establish on a deeper root section where they sometimes develop into micro-colonies. We hypothesize that micro-colonies are the sites where the intracellular N-acyl-L-homoserine lactone concentration is sufficiently high to cause maximal production of biocontrol factors such as antibiotics and exoenzymes and that micro-colonies explain the relatively high conjugation frequency observed between pseudomonads in the rhizosphere.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1094/mpmi.1997.10.1.79

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Chin-A-Woeng, T. F. C., de Priester, W., van der Bij, A. J., & Lugtenberg, B. J. J.
Venue
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
Published
1997-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
79-86
ISSN
  • 0894-0282 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7706
OpenAlex
W2067369481
Cited by
170
References
0
FWCI
10.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Description of the Colonization of a Gnotobiotic Tomato Rhizosphere by Pseudomonas fluorescens Biocontrol Strain WCS365, Using Scanning Electron Microscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1094/mpmi.1997.10.1.79
The paper
Chin-A-Woeng, T. F. C., de Priester, W., van der Bij, A. J., & Lugtenberg, B. J. J. (1997). Description of the Colonization of a Gnotobiotic Tomato Rhizosphere by Pseudomonas fluorescens Biocontrol Strain WCS365, Using Scanning Electron Microscopy. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®. https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi.1997.10.1.79

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.