The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Are root exudates more important than other sources of rhizodeposits in structuring rhizosphere bacterial communities?: Root exudates and rhizosphere bacteria
Open accessAbstract
This review evaluates the importance of root exudates in determining rhizosphere bacterial community structure. We present evidence that indicates that: (1) the direct influence of root exudates on rhizosphere bacterial communities is limited to small spatiotemporal windows related to root apices; (2) upon rapid assimilation by microorganisms, root exudates are modified, independent of plant influences, before rerelease into the rhizosphere by the microorganisms themselves--thus, at short distances from root apices, rhizosphere carbon pools are unlikely to be dominated by root exudates; and (3) many of the major compounds found in root exudates are ubiquitous in the rhizosphere as they are found in other pools of rhizodeposits and in microbial exudates. Following this argument, we suggest that the importance of root exudates in structuring rhizosphere bacterial communities needs to be considered in the context of the wider contribution of other rhizosphere carbon pools. Finally, we discuss the implications of rhizosphere bacterial distribution trends for the development of effective strategies to manage beneficial plant-microorganism interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant sesquiterpenes induce hyphal branching in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
Akiyama, K., Matsuzaki, K.-I., & Hayashi, H. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03608 · Cited by 2,429
Fungal Resistance to Plant Antibiotics as a Mechanism of Pathogenesis
Morrissey, J. P., & Osbourn, A. E. (1999) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.63.3.708-724.1999 · Cited by 635 · cited 2×
“…soil bacteria are not affected by glucosinilates that degrade to toxic (iso)thiocyanates produced by Crucifer and Brassica species, which may deter herbivorous pests and inhibit some fungal root pathogens (Morrissey & Osbourn, 1999), although this may be controversial (Rumberger & Marschner, 2004).”
Background
Cited by
Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants
Bulgarelli, D., Schlaeppi, K., Spaepen, S., van Themaat, E. V. L., & Schulze-Lefert, P. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120106 · Cited by 3,308
Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome
Lundberg, D. S., Lebeis, S. L., Paredes, S. H., Yourstone, S., Gehring, J., Malfatti, S., Tremblay, J., Engelbrektson, A., Kunin, V., Rio, T. G. D., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11237 · Cited by 2,879
Turner, T. R., James, E. K., & Poole, P. S. (2013) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-209 · Cited by 1,349
Carbon input by roots into the soil: Quantification of rhizodeposition from root to ecosystem scale
Pausch, J., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13850 · Cited by 1,010
Functional Soil Microbiome: Belowground Solutions to an Aboveground Problem
Lakshmanan, V., Selvaraj, G., & Bais, H. P. (2014) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.114.245811 · Cited by 400
Metadata
- Authors
- Dennis, P. G., Miller, A. J., & Hirsch, P. R.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-03-08
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 313-327
- ISSN
- 0168-6496 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6941
- OpenAlex
- W2108047624
- Cited by
- 1,038
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 36.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are root exudates more important than other sources of rhizodeposits in structuring rhizosphere bacterial communities?: Root exudates and rhizosphere bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00860.x
- The paper
- Dennis, P. G., Miller, A. J., & Hirsch, P. R. (2010). Are root exudates more important than other sources of rhizodeposits in structuring rhizosphere bacterial communities?: Root exudates and rhizosphere bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00860.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
