The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regulatory Roles of the GacS/GacA Two-Component System in Plant-Associated and Other Gram-Negative Bacteria
Abstract
The sensor kinase GacS and the response regulator GacA are members of a two-component system that is present in a wide variety of Gram-negative bacteria and has been studied mainly in enteric bacteria and fluorescent pseudomonads. The GacS/GacA system controls the production of secondary metabolites and extracellular enzymes involved in pathogenicity to plants and animals, biocontrol of soilborne plant diseases, ecological fitness, or tolerance to stress. A current model proposes that GacS senses a still-unknown signal and activates, via a phosphorelay mechanism, the GacA transcription regulator, which in turn triggers the expression of target genes. The GacS protein belongs to the unorthodox sensor kinases, characterized by an autophosphorylation, a receiver, and an output domain. The periplasmic loop domain of GacS is poorly conserved in diverse bacteria. Thus, a common signal interacting with this domain would be unexpected. Based on a comparison with the transcriptional regulator NarL, a secondary structure can be predicted for the GacA sensor kinases. Certain genes whose expression is regulated by the GacS/GacA system are regulated in parallel by the small RNA binding protein RsmA (CsrA) at a posttranscriptional level. It is suggested that the GacS/GacA system operates a switch between primary and secondary metabolism, with a major involvement of posttranscriptional control mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Needleman, S. B., & Wunsch, C. D. (1970) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(70)90057-4 · Cited by 11,288
Cited by
Raaijmakers, J. M., De Bruijn, I., Nybroe, O., & Ongena, M. (2010) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00221.x · Cited by 1,131
Signals, Regulatory Networks, and Materials That Build and Break Bacterial Biofilms
Karatan, E., & Watnick, P. (2009) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00041-08 · Cited by 1,048
MICROBIAL DYNAMICS AND INTERACTIONS IN THE SPERMOSPHERE
Nelson, E. B. (2004) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.121603.131041 · Cited by 396
Phenazines and their role in biocontrol by Pseudomonas bacteria
Chin‐A‐Woeng, T. F. C., Bloemberg, G. V., & Lugtenberg, B. J. J. (2003) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00686.x · Cited by 375
Mercado-Blanco, J., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2007) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1007/s10482-007-9167-1 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Heeb, S., & Haas, D.
- Venue
- Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
- Publisher
- Scientific Societies
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1351-1363
- ISSN
- 0894-0282 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7706
- OpenAlex
- W1997810660
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regulatory Roles of the GacS/GacA Two-Component System in Plant-Associated and Other Gram-Negative Bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1094/mpmi.2001.14.12.1351
- The paper
- Heeb, S., & Haas, D. (2001). Regulatory Roles of the GacS/GacA Two-Component System in Plant-Associated and Other Gram-Negative Bacteria. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®. https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi.2001.14.12.1351
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.