The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Root Mucilage from Pea and Its Utilization by Rhizosphere Bacteria as a Sole Carbon Source
Open accessAbstract
Plant roots secrete a complex polysaccharide mucilage that may provide a significant source of carbon for microbes that colonize the rhizosphere. High molecular weight mucilage was separated by high-pressure liquid chromatography gel filtration from low molecular weight components of pea root exudate. Purified pea root mucilage generally was similar in sugar and glycosidic linkage composition to mucilage from cowpea, wheat, rice, and maize, but appeared to contain an unusually high amount of material that was similar to arabinogalactan protein. Purified pea mucilage was used as the sole carbon source for growth of several pea rhizosphere bacteria, including Rhizobium leguminosarum 8401 and 4292, Burkholderia cepacia AMMD, and Pseudomonas fluorescens PRA25. These species grew on mucilage to cell densities of three- to 25-fold higher than controls with no added carbon source, with cell densities of 1 to 15% of those obtained on an equal weight of glucose. Micromolar concentrations of nod gene-inducing flavonoids specifically stimulated mucilage-dependent growth of R. leguminosarum 8401 to levels almost equaling the glucose controls. R. leguminosarum 8401 was able to hydrolyze p-nitrophenyl glycosides of various sugars and partially utilize a number of purified plant polysaccharides as sole carbon sources, indicating that R. leguminosarum 8401 can make an unexpected variety of carbohydrases, in accordance with its ability to extensively utilize pea root mucilage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Compant, S., Duffy, B., Nowak, J., Clément, C., & Barka, E. A. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.9.4951-4959.2005 · Cited by 2,640
Compant, S., Clément, C., & Sessitsch, A. (2010) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.024 · Cited by 2,318
Van Deynze, A., Zamora, P., Delaux, P.-M., Heitmann, C., Jayaraman, D., Rajasekar, S., Graham, D., Maeda, J., Gibson, D., Schwartz, K. D., et al. (2018) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2006352 · Cited by 396
Rees, R. M., Bingham, I. J., Baddeley, J. A., & Watson, C. A. (2005) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.12.020 · Cited by 235
Beneficial soil-borne bacteria and fungi: a promising way to improve plant nitrogen acquisition
Dellagi, A., Quillere, I., & Hirel, B. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eraa112 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Knee, E. M., Gong, F.-C., Gao, M., Teplitski, M., Jones, A. R., Foxworthy, A., Mort, A. J., & Bauer, W. D.
- Venue
- Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
- Publisher
- Scientific Societies
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 775-784
- ISSN
- 0894-0282 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7706
- OpenAlex
- W1964135138
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Root Mucilage from Pea and Its Utilization by Rhizosphere Bacteria as a Sole Carbon Source. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1094/mpmi.2001.14.6.775
- The paper
- Knee, E. M., Gong, F.-C., Gao, M., Teplitski, M., Jones, A. R., Foxworthy, A., Mort, A. J., & Bauer, W. D. (2001). Root Mucilage from Pea and Its Utilization by Rhizosphere Bacteria as a Sole Carbon Source. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®. https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi.2001.14.6.775
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.