Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evaluation of Streptomycin, Oxytetracycline, and Copper Resistance of Erwinia amylovora Isolated from Pear Orchards in Washington State

Loper, Joyce E.·1991·Plant Disease

Abstract

One hundred and thirty-eight pathogenic strains of E. amylovora were isolated from fire blight cankers of pear trees from 44 orchards in the major pear-growing regions of Washington State. Ninety-eight strains, isolated from 38 of the orchards sampled, were resistant to streptomycin (1 mg/ml). Streptomycin-resistant strains of E. amylovora were ubiquitous in all of the major pear-growing regions of Washington. None of the strains tested were resistant to oxytetracycline (25 μg/ml) or CuSO 4 (0.16 mM). Nevertheless, spontaneous mutants with tolerance to 0.16 mM CuSO 4 were observed at a frequency of 10 −6 -10 −7 mutant colonies per wild type colony in most strains

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1094/pd-75-0287

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Loper, J. E.
Venue
Plant Disease
Published
1991
Volume
75
Issue
3
Pages
287
ISSN
0191-2917 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060340422
Cited by
158
References
0
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Streptomycin, Oxytetracycline, and Copper Resistance of Erwinia amylovora Isolated from Pear Orchards in Washington State. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1094/pd-75-0287
The paper
Loper, J. E. (1991). Evaluation of Streptomycin, Oxytetracycline, and Copper Resistance of Erwinia amylovora Isolated from Pear Orchards in Washington State. Plant Disease. https://doi.org/10.1094/pd-75-0287

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.