Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 752

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Selective Media for Isolation of Agrobacterium, Corynebacterium, Erwinia, Pseudomonas, and Xanthomonas

Kado, C. I., Heskett, M. G.·2025·Phytopathology®

Abstract

Five selective plating media (designated as D-series media) were developed for plant-pathogenic bacteria in the genera Agrobacterium, Corynebacterium (including species pathogenic for animals and man), Erwinia, Pseudomonas, and Xanthomonas. The active constituents of these media were lithium chloride, sodium dodecyl sulfate, polymyxin, and glycine, all of which are known to affect the permeability of bacterial membranes. These selective media were designed using one or a combination of these compounds to permit the growth of bacteria of one genus and restrict the growth of all others. Using inoculum containing a mixture of different bacteria, the efficiencies of these media are as follows: Plating efficiencies ([colony numbers on selective medium : colony numbers on nonselective medium] × 10 2) were 90.3% for A. tumefaciens on medium D1; 27.1% for C. michiganense on medium D2; 77.7% for E. amylovora on medium D3; 6.5% for P. syringae on medium D4; and 78.4% for X. campestris on medium D5. Recovery efficiencies ([colony numbers from soil on selective medium: colony numbers without soil on the same selective medium] × 10 2) of the respective bacteria from soil artificially inoculated with a mixture of bacteria were 48.1% on D1, 79.8% on D2, 57.0% on D3, 26.9% on D4, and 79.9% on D5. Recovery of the pathogenic bacteria from diseased tissues was facilitated by these media.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1094/phyto-60-969

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kado, C. I., & Heskett, M. G.
Venue
Phytopathology®
Published
2025-08-01
Volume
115
Issue
8V
Pages
969-976
ISSN
  • 0031-949X (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7684
OpenAlex
W2024336686
Cited by
752
References
0
FWCI
32.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.