The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Suppression of Take-All of Wheat by Seed Treatments with Fluorescent Pseudomonads
Abstract
Strains of fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. applied to wheat seeds suppressed take-all in both greenhouse- and field-grown winter and spring wheat. The effective strains were originally isolated from roots of wheat grown in soil naturally suppressive to take-all and were selected on the basis of in vitro antibiosis to Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici. Isolate 2-79, alone or combined with isolate 13-79, suppressed take-all in five of six field tests conducted in nonfumigated soil infested with inoculum of G. graminis var. tritici. The combination treatment was more suppressive than 13-79 alone in all field tests, and was slightly more suppressive than 2-79 alone in three of six field tests. Suppression of take-all by the bacteria was expressed in the field as fewer plants with foliage symptoms of take-all and taller plants, more heads, greater yield, and less root disease than those grown from nontreated seed. Tests in field plots fumigated with methyl bromide, with and without the reintroduction of G. graminis var. tritici, established that the bacteria do not promote plant growth other than by controlling of take-all. The seed treatment resulted in increased yields of up to 147% in fumigated soil and up to 27% in natural soil. An antibiotic-resistant strain of 2-79 was isolated from the roots of wheat in the field following germination of bacteria-treated seed. The population of the introduced bacterium exceeded 10 6 colony-forming units per 0.1 g of root tissue 3 wk after planting. The populations of strains 2-79 and 13-79 applied on wheat seeds with methylcellulose were stable for 21 days at 5 or 15 C, but declined rapidly at 25 C.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biocontrol of Soilborne Plant Pathogens.
Handelsman, J., & Stabb, E. V. (1996) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.8.10.1855 · Cited by 624
Disease-Suppressive Soil and Root-Colonizing Bacteria
Schroth, M. N., & Hancock, J. G. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.216.4553.1376 · Cited by 522
Phenazines and their role in biocontrol by Pseudomonas bacteria
Chin‐A‐Woeng, T. F. C., Bloemberg, G. V., & Lugtenberg, B. J. J. (2003) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00686.x · Cited by 375
Berg, G., Fritze, A., Roskot, N., & Smalla, K. (2001) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01462.x · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Weller, D. M., & Cook, R. J.
- Venue
- Phytopathology®
- Publisher
- Scientific Societies
- Published
- 2025-08-01
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 8V
- Pages
- 463-469
- ISSN
- 0031-949X (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7684
- OpenAlex
- W2013105758
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Suppression of Take-All of Wheat by Seed Treatments with Fluorescent Pseudomonads. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1094/phyto-73-463
- The paper
- Weller, D. M., & Cook, R. J. (2025). Suppression of Take-All of Wheat by Seed Treatments with Fluorescent Pseudomonads. Phytopathology®. https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-73-463
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.