The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Control of Postharvest Pathogens and Colonization of the Apple Surface by Antagonistic Microorganisms in the Field
Open accessAbstract
Selected isolates of Aureobasidium pullulans, Rhodotorula glutinis, and Bacillus subtilis reduced the size and number of lesions on wounded apples caused by the postharvest pathogens Penicillium expansum, Botrytis cinerea, and Pezicula malicorticis. Combinations of the antagonistic microorganisms were applied to apple trees in the field late in the growing season of two consecutive years. The population dynamics of the introduced microorganisms and the incidence of fruit decay were determined. Population sizes of introduced antagonists on apple surfaces increased in the field following application of treatments until harvest. After transfer of the fruit from the field into cold storage, the populations of the introduced antagonists remained higher than in the control treatments. Identification of the applied isolates of A. pullulans and R. glutinis during the experiments was achieved by isolate-specific DNA probes generated from random amplified polymorphic DNA. A combination of two strains of A. pullulans and one strain of R. glutinis suppressed rotting of apple to the same extent as the commonly used fungicide Euparen. Our data demonstrate that the application of antagonistic microorganisms in the field represents a promising alternative to fungicide treatments to control post-harvest diseases of apple.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The basidiomycetous yeast A. pullulans is a cosmopolitan species that is used in biotechnology and acts as an antagonist against fungal and bacterial plant pathogens such as postharvest diseases or fire blight [25, 89–95].”
From Competition assays and physiological experiments of soil and phyllosphere yeasts identify Candida subhashii as a novel antagonist of filamentous fungi (2017) · cites this paper as [94]
Citations
Cites
A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity
Feinberg, A. P., & Vogelstein, B. (1983) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(83)90418-9 · Cited by 24,512
Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology
(1990) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-112-5-391_3 · Cited by 15,633
Applied Nonparametric Statistics
Wozniak, P. J., & Daniel, W. W. (1991) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1268795 · Cited by 5,008
Siegel, S. (1957) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.1957.10501091 · Cited by 4,128
The genera of fungi sporulating in pure culture
von Arx, J. A. (1970) · Cited by 715
Rapid extraction of fungal DNA for PCR amplification
Cenís, J. L. (1992) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/20.9.2380 · Cited by 681
Compendium of Apple and Pear Diseases
G., D. A., Jones, A. L., & Aldwinckle, H. S. (1990) · Mycologia · doi:10.2307/3760176 · Cited by 475
Biological Control of Postharvest Diseases of Fruits and Vegetables: Recent Advances
Wisniewski, M., & Wilson, C. L. (1992) · HortScience · doi:10.21273/hortsci.27.2.94 · Cited by 289
Postharvest Biological Control of Gray Mold of Apple byCryptococcus laurentii
Roberts, R. G. (1990) · Phytopathology · doi:10.1094/phyto-80-526 · Cited by 206
Combination ofTrichoderma koningiiwith Fluorescent Pseudomonads for Control of Take-all on Wheat
Duffy, B. K. (1996) · Phytopathology · doi:10.1094/phyto-86-188 · Cited by 196
Kim, D., Cook, R., & Weller, D. M. (1997) · Phytopathology · doi:10.1094/phyto.1997.87.5.551 · Cited by 175
Wilson, C. L., Wisniewski, M., Droby, S., & Chalutz, E. (1993) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/0304-4238(93)90066-y · Cited by 173
Janisiewicz, W. J. (1996) · Phytopathology · doi:10.1094/phyto-86-473 · Cited by 162
Biocontrol of Postharvest Diseases of Apples with Antagonist Mixtures
Janisiewicz, W. J. (1988) · Phytopathology · doi:10.1094/phyto-78-194 · Cited by 161
Schisler, D. A., Slininger, P. J., & Bothast, R. J. (1997) · Phytopathology · doi:10.1094/phyto.1997.87.2.177 · Cited by 144
Janisiewicz, W. J., & Bors, B. (1995) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.61.9.3261-3267.1995 · Cited by 137
Control of Storage Rots on Various Pear Cultivars with a Saprophytic Strain ofPseudomonas syringae
Janisiewicz, W. J. (1992) · Plant Disease · doi:10.1094/pd-76-0555 · Cited by 120
Duffy, B. K. (1995) · Plant Disease · doi:10.1094/pd-79-0907 · Cited by 110
Köhl, J. (1995) · Phytopathology · doi:10.1094/phyto-85-393 · Cited by 88
Control of Storage Decay of Apples withSporobolomyces roseus
Janisiewicz, W. J. (1994) · Plant Disease · doi:10.1094/pd-78-0466 · Cited by 84
Production of antibacterial compounds by phylloplane-inhabiting yeasts and yeastlike fungi
McCormack, P. J., Wildman, H., & Jeffries, P. (1994) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.60.3.927-931.1994 · Cited by 82
Elead, Y., Köhl, J., & Fokkema, N. J. (1994) · European Journal of Plant Pathology · doi:10.1007/bf01876443 · Cited by 82
Biological and integrated controls of Botrytis cinerea on apple with Trichoderma harzianum
Tronsmo, A. (1991) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/1049-9644(91)90102-6 · Cited by 66
Detection of Latent Infections in Apple Fruit with Paraquat
Biggs, A. R. (1995) · Plant Disease · doi:10.1094/pd-79-1062 · Cited by 62
Incidence of postharvest pathogens of stored apples in British Columbia
Sholberg, P. L., & Haag, P. (1996) · Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology · doi:10.1080/07060669609500661 · Cited by 58
Integrating Biological Control into Postharvest Disease Management Strategies
Roberts, R. G. (1994) · HortScience · doi:10.21273/hortsci.29.7.758 · Cited by 43
Fungal immigration dynamics and community development on apple leaves
Kinkel, L. L., Andrews, J. H., & Nordheim, E. V. (1989) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/bf02011695 · Cited by 42
Biocontrol of postharvest diseases of apple usingBacillusspp. isolated from stored apples
Sholberg, P. L., Marchi, A., & Bechard, J. (1995) · Canadian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1139/m95-034 · Cited by 40
Falconi, C. J., & Mendgen, K. W. (1994) · KOPS (University of Konstanz) · Cited by 38
Self-citationBiological Control ofBotrytis cinereaon Apple
Tronsmo, A. (1980) · Plant Disease · doi:10.1094/pd-64-1009 · Cited by 38
Rodgers, P. B. (1989) · Pesticide Science · doi:10.1002/ps.2780270206 · Cited by 34
Schiewe, A., & Mendgen, K. W. (1992) · Journal of Phytopathology · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0434.1992.tb01231.x · Cited by 18
Self-citationMendgen, K. W., Schiewe, A., Falconi, C. J., & Auer, B. (1993) · Cited by 1
Self-citationVergleichende Untersuchungen zu Richtlinien für die integrierte Kernobstproduktion in Europa
Schäfermeyer, S., & Dickler, E. (1991) · OpenAgrar · doi:10.5073/20210629-102721 · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Falconi C. J., 1994, J. Plant Dis. Prot., 101, 38
- Kennel W., 1986, Obst Garten, 3, 151
- Kennel W., 1988, Obst Garten, 10, 489
- Koch E., 1996, Gesunde Pflanzen, 48, 11
- Li H., 1994, J. Plant Dis. Prot., 101, 414
- Mendgen K., 1993, IOBC/WPRS (Int. Organ. Biol. Integrated Control Noxious Anim. Plants/ West Palaearctic Sect.) Bull., 16, 115
Cited by
Sorted by citations
B IOLOGICAL C ONTROL OF P OSTHARVEST D ISEASES OF F RUITS
Janisiewicz, W. J., & Korsten, L. (2002) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.40.120401.130158 · Cited by 1,020
Sharma, R. R., Singh, D., & Singh, R. (2009) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.05.001 · Cited by 1,015
Commercialization and Implementation of Biocontrol
Fravel, D. R. (2005) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.032904.092924 · Cited by 906
Twenty years of postharvest biocontrol research: Is it time for a new paradigm?
Droby, S., Wisniewski, M., Macarisin, D., & Wilson, C. (2009) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.11.009 · Cited by 758
Raupach, G. S., & Kloepper, J. W. (1998) · Phytopathology · doi:10.1094/phyto.1998.88.11.1158 · Cited by 634
Metadata
- Authors
- Leibinger, W., Breuker, B., Hahn, M., & Mendgen, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Konstanz (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Mendgen, Kurt
- ORCID
- Hahn, Matthias
- Venue
- Phytopathology®
- Publisher
- Scientific Societies
- Published
- 1997-11
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1103-1110
- ISSN
- 0031-949X (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7684
- OpenAlex
- W2107044309
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 8.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Phytopathology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
- Keywords
- apple postharvest disease, biological control, antagonistic microorganisms, Aureobasidium pullulans, Rhodotorula glutinis, Bacillus subtilis, Penicillium expansum, Botrytis cinerea, fruit decay, cold storage, population dynamics, fungicide alternatives, DNA probes, RAPD markers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
