Cited by 1,015Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life ManagementFungal Plant Pathogen ControlListeria monocytogenes in Food Safety

Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables by microbial antagonists: A review

Sharma, R.R., Singh, Dinesh, Singh, Rajbir·2009·Biological Control

Abstract

Postharvest diseases cause considerable losses to harvested fruits and vegetables during transportation and storage. Synthetic fungicides are primarily used to control postharvest decay loss. However, the recent trend is shifting toward safer and more eco-friendly alternatives for the control of postharvest decays. Of various biological approaches, the use of antagonistic microorganisms is becoming popular throughout the world. Several postharvest diseases can now be controlled by microbial antagonists. Although the mechanism(s) by which microbial antagonists suppress the postharvest diseases is still unknown, competition for nutrients and space is most widely accepted mechanism of their action. In addition, production of antibiotics, direct parasitism, and possibly induced resistance in the harvested commodity are other modes of their actions by which they suppress the activity of postharvest pathogens in fruits and vegetables. Microbial antagonists are applied either before or after harvest, but postharvest applications are more effective than preharvest applications. Mixed cultures of the microbial antagonists appear to provide better control of postharvest diseases over individual cultures or strains. Similarly, the efficacy of the microbial antagonist(s) can be enhanced if they are used with low doses of fungicides, salt additives, and physical treatments like hot water dips, irradiation with ultraviolet light etc. At the international level, different microbial antagonists like Debaryomyces hansenii Lodder & Krejer-van Rij, Cryptococcus laurentii Kufferath & Skinner, Bacillus subtilis (Ehrenberg) Cohn, and Trichoderma harzianum Rifai, are being used. Biocontrol products like Aspire, BioSave, and Shemer etc., have also been developed and registered. Although the results of this technology are encouraging, we need to continue to explore potential uses on the commercial scale in different corners of the world.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.05.001

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharma, R. R., Singh, D., & Singh, R.
Affiliations
  • Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IN)
  • Central Institute of Post-Harvest Engineering and Technology (IN)
Corresponding author
Sharma, R.R.
Venue
Biological Control
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
205-221
ISSN
1049-9644 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076370029
Cited by
1,015
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 83 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 45
FWCI
42.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biological Control (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
Keywords
postharvest disease, microbial antagonists, fruits and vegetables, postharvest decay, nutrient competition, induced resistance, mixed culture, fungicide reduction, hot water immersion, UV irradiation, Debaryomyces hansenii, Cryptococcus laurentii, Bacillus subtilis, Trichoderma harzianum, biocontrol products

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review