The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Combining Biocontrol Agents to Reduce the Variability of Biological Control
Abstract
Two biocontrol agents, a yeast (Pichia guilermondii) and a bacterium (Bacillus mycoides), were tested separately and together for suppression of Botrytis cinerea on strawberry leaves. The aims of the research were to determine whether the use of their combination would broaden the environmental conditions under which biological control is effective, and to test the hypothesis that it would reduce the variability of control efficacy under diverse conditions. Applied separately, the biocontrol agents significantly inhibited spore germination, lesion formation, and lesion development at most temperatures, relative humidities, and spray-timing combinations (temperatures: 10, 15, 20, 23, 25, and 30°C; relative humidities: 78, 85, 96, and 100%; and spray-timings: 0, 4, and 7 days before inoculation). However, control efficacy was highly variable, and under certain combinations it was not adequate. Control efficacy achieved by the biocontrol agents applied separately ranged between 38 and 98% (mean 74%) and the coefficient of variation ranged from 9.7 to 75%. The mixture of Bacillus mycoides and Pichia guilermondii suppressed Botrytis cinerea effectively (80 to 99.8% control) under all conditions, and the coefficients of variation were as low as 0.4 to 9% in all cases. Thus, application of both biocontrol agents resulted in better suppression of Botrytis cinerea, and also reduced the variability of disease control. Application of more than one biocontrol agent is suggested as a reliable means of reducing the variability and increasing the reliability of biological control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Control of Infection and Sporulation of Botrytis cinerea on Bean and Tomato by Saprophytic Yeasts
Elad, Y. (1994) · Phytopathology · doi:10.1094/phyto-84-1193 · Cited by 109
Self-citationColonization of Bean Flowers by Epicoccum purpurascens
Zhou, T. (1991) · Phytopathology · doi:10.1094/phyto-81-774 · Cited by 21
Cited by
Induction of Systemic Resistance in Plants by Biochar, a Soil-Applied Carbon Sequestering Agent
Elad, Y., David, D. R., Harel, Y. M., Borenshtein, M., Kalifa, H. B., Silber, A., & Graber, E. R. (2010) · Phytopathology · doi:10.1094/phyto-100-9-0913 · Cited by 398
Self-citationGuetsky, R., Shtienberg, D., Elad, Y., Fischer, E., & Dinoor, A. (2002) · Phytopathology® · doi:10.1094/phyto.2002.92.9.976 · Cited by 293
Self-citationBardin, M., Ajouz, S., Comby, M., Lopez-Ferber, M., Graillot, B., Siegwart, M., & Nicot, P. C. (2015) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00566 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Guetsky, R., Shtienberg, D., Elad, Y., & Dinoor, A.
- Venue
- Phytopathology®
- Publisher
- Scientific Societies
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 621-627
- ISSN
- 0031-949X (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7684
- OpenAlex
- W2024330004
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combining Biocontrol Agents to Reduce the Variability of Biological Control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1094/phyto.2001.91.7.621
- The paper
- Guetsky, R., Shtienberg, D., Elad, Y., & Dinoor, A. (2001). Combining Biocontrol Agents to Reduce the Variability of Biological Control. Phytopathology®. https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto.2001.91.7.621
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.