Cited by 22Plant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesPowdery Mildew Fungal DiseasesEntomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control

Colonization of Bean Flowers by Epicoccum purpurascens

Zhou, Ting·1991·Phytopathology

Abstract

Emerging flowers, newly opened flowers, and senescent flowers of bean were sprayed with conidial suspensions of Epicoccum purpurascens, then sampled at 4, 8, 12, 24, and 96 h. The number of conidia per square millimeter of tissue surface was greater on newly opened or senescent flowers than on emerging flowers. Germination of conidia was greater on senescent petals than on younger tissue. However, conidia applied to emerging flowers germinated sufficiently such that resultant hyphae were able to completely colonize flowers as they senesced (...)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1094/phyto-81-774

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, T.
Corresponding author
Zhou, Ting
Venue
Phytopathology
Published
1991
Volume
81
Issue
7
Pages
774
ISSN
0031-949X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092040445
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Phytopathology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Powdery Mildew Fungal Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
Keywords
Epicoccum purpurascens, conidial germination, conidial inoculation, hyphal growth, plant pathogenic fungi

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review