The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Limited DNA Methylation Reprogramming in the Normal Sheep Embryo on Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer1
Abstract
Active demethylation of cytosine residues in the sperm genome before forming a functional zygotic nucleus is thought to be an important function of the oocyte cytoplasm for subsequent embryonic development in the mouse. Conversely, this event does not occur in the sheep or rabbit zygote and occurs only partially in the cow. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of limited methylation reprogramming in the normal sheep embryo on reprogramming somatic nuclei. Sheep fibroblast somatic nuclei were partially demethylated after electrofusion with recipient sheep oocytes and undergo a stepwise passive loss of DNA methylation during early development, as determined by 5-methylcytosine immunostaining on interphase embryonic nuclei. A similar decrease takes place with in vivo-derived sheep embryos up to the eight-cell stage, although nuclear transfer embryos exhibit a consistently higher level of methylation at each stage. Between the eight-cell and blastocyst stages, DNA methylation levels in nuclear transfer embryos are comparable with those derived in vivo, but the distribution of methylated DNA is abnormal in a high proportion. By correlating DNA methylation with developmental potential at individual stages, our results suggest that somatic nuclei that do not undergo rapid reorganization of their DNA before the first mitosis fail to develop within two to three cell cycles and that the observed methylation defects in early cleavage stages more likely occur as a direct consequence of failed nuclear reorganization than in failed demethylation capacity. However, because only embryos with reorganized chromatin appear to survive the 16-cell and morula stages, failure to demethylate the trophectoderm cells of the blastocyst is likely to directly impact on developmental potential by altering programmed patterns of gene expression in extra-embryonic tissues. Thus, both remodeling of DNA and epigenetic reprogramming appear critical for development of both fertilized and nuclear transfer embryos.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory
Bird, A. (2002) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.947102 · Cited by 7,124
Jaenisch, R., & Bird, A. (2003) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1089 · Cited by 6,325
Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality
Li, E., Bestor, T. H., & Jaenisch, R. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90611-f · Cited by 3,984
Metadata
- Authors
- Beaujean, N., Taylor, J., Gardner, J., Wilmut, I., Meehan, R., & Young, L.
- Venue
- Biology of Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-07-01
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 185-193
- ISSN
- 0006-3363 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-7268
- OpenAlex
- W2053542179
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Limited DNA Methylation Reprogramming in the Normal Sheep Embryo on Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1095/biolreprod.103.026559
- The paper
- Beaujean, N., Taylor, J., Gardner, J., Wilmut, I., Meehan, R., & Young, L. (2004). Effect of Limited DNA Methylation Reprogramming in the Normal Sheep Embryo on Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer1. Biology of Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.026559
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.