The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantification of the Human Sertoli Cell Population: Its Distribution, Relation to Germ Cell Numbers, and Age-Related Decline 1
Open accessAbstract
The human Sertoli cell population was characterized in 14 men by histometric analysis and by direct counts of nuclei in testicular homogenates. Testes obtained at autopsy were perfused with glutaraldehyde and embedded in Epon. Nucleolar and nuclear volumes were determined by the formula of a sphere given the diameter of the nucleoli or average diameter of nuclei measured at the height and width. Nuclear volume was also estimated by adding volumes of nuclear profiles in 0.5-micron serial sections. Sertoli cell number/g was calculated by the product of the percentage nucleoli or nuclei in the parenchyma, parenchymal volume, and histologic correction factor divided by the volume of a single nucleolus or nucleus. Also, Sertoli cell nuclei were counted directly in homogenates of fixed parenchyma. Number of Sertoli cells/g was similar (P greater than 0.05) whether determined by serial sections or in homogenates, but the estimate based on the nucleolar method was higher (P less than 0.01) and the nuclear measurement method was lower (P less than 0.01) than that for serial sections. A group of 37 men aged 20 to 48 yr had significantly (P less than 0.01) more Sertoli cells than did 34 men aged 50 to 85 yr. It is concluded that: 1) the homogenate method is valid for quantification of the Sertoli cell population, 2) Sertoli cells are evenly distributed in different regions of the testis, 3) the average human Sertoli cell supports relatively few germ cells, 4) the human Sertoli cell population declines with age, and 5) there is a significant relationship between sperm production rates and number of Sertoli cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Leydig cell numbers, daily sperm production, and serum gonadotropin levels in aging men
NEAVES, W. B., JOHNSON, L., PORTER, J. C., PARKER, C. R., & PETTY, C. S. (1984) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-59-4-756 · Cited by 495
Cited by
Andropause: clinical implications of the decline in serum testosterone levels with aging in men
Matsumoto, A. M. (2002) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/57.2.m76 · Cited by 490
The Cycle of the Seminiferous Epithelium in Humans: A Need to Revisit?
Amann, R. P. (2008) · Journal of Andrology · doi:10.2164/jandrol.107.004655 · Cited by 324
Ford, W. C. L. (2000) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/15.8.1703 · Cited by 265
Male late-onset hypogonadism: pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment
Huhtaniemi, I., & Forti, G. (2011) · Nature Reviews Urology · doi:10.1038/nrurol.2011.47 · Cited by 88
TENOVER, J. S., & BREMNER, W. J. (1991) · Journal of Andrology · doi:10.1002/j.1939-4640.1991.tb00265.x · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, L., Zane, R. S., Petty, C. S., & Neaves, W. B.
- Venue
- Biology of Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1984-11-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 785-795
- ISSN
- 0006-3363 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-7268
- OpenAlex
- W2144687593
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantification of the Human Sertoli Cell Population: Its Distribution, Relation to Germ Cell Numbers, and Age-Related Decline 1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1095/biolreprod31.4.785
- The paper
- Johnson, L., Zane, R. S., Petty, C. S., & Neaves, W. B. (1984). Quantification of the Human Sertoli Cell Population: Its Distribution, Relation to Germ Cell Numbers, and Age-Related Decline 1. Biology of Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod31.4.785
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.