Cited by 73Sexual Differentiation and DisordersHypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Differential Effects of the Perinatal Steroid Environment on Three Sexually Dimorphic Parameters of the Rat Brain1

Abstract

Gonadectomy of male rats was performed at 0, 6-7 (6h), 12-13 (12h), or 24 h postnatally in order to examine the influence of testosterone exposure on sexual differentiation of the brain. The indices examined were: the volume of the sexually dimorphic nucleus of the preoptic area (SDN-POA) and luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) titers following estradiol benzoate (EB) and progesterone (P) administration. Control animals were sham-operated at 0 h and gonadectomized at 29 days of age (sham). A decrease in the percentage of males with elevated plasma LH levels following P was found with increasing delay before gonadectomy. Significant (P less than 0.001) differences existed in the amplitude of plasma LH titers 5 h following P administration between sham, 0 h, and 6 h groups. Follicle-stimulating hormone was also elevated in all neonatally gonadectomized male groups following P administration, but there was no difference between the groups. Volume of the SDN-POA was significantly (P less than 0.001) smaller in all gonadectomized males when compared to that of sham-operated males, but no differences existed between males gonadectomized at the different hours postpartum. In female rats gonadectomized at 0 h (F0h), LH levels were elevated 5 h following P, but only to a magnitude of 36% of that of sham-operated controls (P less than 0.001). Volume of the SDN-POA of the F0h group was significantly reduced (P less than 0.05) when compared to that of sham fem…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1095/biolreprod32.4.855

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Handa, R. J., Corbier, P., Shryne, J. E., Schoonmaker, J. N., & Gorski, R. A.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Biology of Reproduction
Published
1985-05-01
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
855-864
ISSN
  • 0006-3363 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-7268
OpenAlex
W2165820694
Cited by
73
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biology of Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-01182)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Keywords
gonadectomy, sexual differentiation of the brain, sexually dimorphic nucleus, preoptic area, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, estradiol benzoate, progesterone, androgen exposure, masculinization, brain development, sex differences
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Brain, Castration, Estradiol, Feedback, Female, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Luteinizing Hormone, Male, Preoptic Area, Progesterone, Sex Differentiation, Testosterone, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review