The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Presence of Endogenous Nicks in DNA of Ejaculated Human Spermatozoa and its Relationship to Chromomycin A3 Accessibility1
Open accessAbstract
During spermiogenesis, mammalian chromatin undergoes replacement of nuclear histones by protamines, resulting in a DNA that is highly condensed in the mature sperm. We have previously demonstrated that a percentage of human spermatozoa exhibit 1) positivity to the guanine-cylosine-specific chromomycin A3 (CMA3) fluorochrome and 2) the presence of endogenous nicks in their DNA. In situ protamination of mature human sperm limits the percentage of sperm positive to CMA3 and exhibiting endogenous nicks. In this study, we report further investigations that aim to clarify the relationship existing between levels of CMA3 stainability and the presence of endogenous nicks in the DNA of mature human spermatozoa. Human spermatozoa from 25 different samples showed values of sensitivity to the CMA3 fluorochrome ranging from 13% to 75%. The same samples showed a percentage of sensitivity to endogenous nick translation ranging from 1% to 38%. A strong correlation (r = 0.86) was evident between these two parameters. Prior staining of sperm with the CMA3 fluorochrome drastically reduced sensitivity to nick translation. In contrast, previously nick-translated sperm stained with CMA3 showed very little difference from samples that had not been pretreated. The presence of nicked sperm in the ejaculate may indicate anomalies during spermiogenesis and be an indicator of male infertility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
EVENSON, D. P., LARSON, K. L., & JOST, L. K. (2002) · Journal of Andrology · doi:10.1002/j.1939-4640.2002.tb02599.x · Cited by 1,072
Recurrent implantation failure: definition and management
Coughlan, C., Ledger, W., Wang, Q., Liu, F., Demirol, A., Gurgan, T., Cutting, R., Ong, K., Sallam, H., & Li, T. C. (2014) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.08.011 · Cited by 904
Sperm DNA fragmentation: mechanisms of origin, impact on reproductive outcome, and analysis
Sakkas, D., & Alvarez, J. G. (2010) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.046 · Cited by 782
Self-citationSperm chromatin damage impairs human fertility
Spanò, M., Bonde, J. P., Hjøllund, H. I., Kolstad, H. A., Cordelli, E., & Leter, G. (2000) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00462-8 · Cited by 719
Nature of DNA Damage in Ejaculated Human Spermatozoa and the Possible Involvement of Apoptosis1
Sakkas, D., Moffatt, O., Manicardi, G. C., Mariethoz, E., Tarozzi, N., & Bizzaro, D. (2002) · Biology of Reproduction · doi:10.1095/biolreprod66.4.1061 · Cited by 447
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Manicardi, G. C., Bianchi, P. G., Pantano, S., Azzoni, P., Bizzaro, D., Bianchi, U., & Sakkas, D.
- Venue
- Biology of Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-04-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 864-867
- ISSN
- 0006-3363 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-7268
- OpenAlex
- W1964783995
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Presence of Endogenous Nicks in DNA of Ejaculated Human Spermatozoa and its Relationship to Chromomycin A3 Accessibility1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1095/biolreprod52.4.864
- The paper
- Manicardi, G. C., Bianchi, P. G., Pantano, S., Azzoni, P., Bizzaro, D., Bianchi, U., & Sakkas, D. (1995). Presence of Endogenous Nicks in DNA of Ejaculated Human Spermatozoa and its Relationship to Chromomycin A3 Accessibility1. Biology of Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod52.4.864
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.