The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differential Effects of Culture on Imprinted H19 Expression in the Preimplantation Mouse Embryo1
Open accessAbstract
The H19 gene is imprinted with preferential expression from the maternal allele. The putative imprinting control region for this locus is hypermethylated on the repressed paternal allele. Although maternal-specific expression of H19 is observed in mouse blastocysts that develop in vivo, biallelic expression has been documented in embryos and embryonic stem cells experimentally manipulated by in vitro culture conditions. In this study the effect of culture on imprinted H19 expression and methylation was determined. After culture of 2-cell embryos to the blastocyst stage in Whitten's medium, the normally silent paternal H19 allele was aberrantly expressed, whereas little paternal expression was observed following culture in KSOM containing amino acids (KSOM+AA). Analysis of the methylation status of a CpG dinucleotide located in the upstream imprinting control region revealed a loss in methylation in embryos cultured in Whitten's medium but not in embryos cultured in KSOM+AA. Thus, H19 expression and methylation were adversely affected by culture in Whitten's medium, while the response of H19 to culture in KSOM+AA approximated more closely the in vivo situation. It is unlikely that biallelic expression of H19 following culture in Whitten's medium is a generalized effect of lower methylation levels, since the amount of DNA methyltransferase activity and the spatial distribution of Dnmt1 protein were similar in in vivo-derived and cultured embryos. Moreover, imprinted expression of Snrpn was maintained following culture in either medium, indicating that not all imprinted genes are under the same stringent imprinting controls. The finding that culture conditions can dramatically, but selectively, affect the expression of imprinted genes provides a model system for further study of the linkage between DNA methylation and gene expression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality
Li, E., Bestor, T. H., & Jaenisch, R. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90611-f · Cited by 3,984
Cited by
Effect of In Utero and Early-Life Conditions on Adult Health and Disease
Gluckman, P. D., Hanson, M. A., Cooper, C., & Thornburg, K. L. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra0708473 · Cited by 3,898
Persistent epigenetic differences associated with prenatal exposure to famine in humans
Heijmans, B. T., Tobi, E. W., Stein, A. D., Putter, H., Blauw, G. J., Susser, E. S., Slagboom, P. E., & Lumey, L. H. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0806560105 · Cited by 3,082
Epigenetics and the environment: emerging patterns and implications
Feil, R., & Fraga, M. F. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3142 · Cited by 1,929
Maternal Nutrition and Fetal Development
Bazer, F. W., Spencer, T. E., Wu, G., Cudd, T. A., & Meininger, C. J. (2004) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/134.9.2169 · Cited by 1,019
Fernández-Gonzalez, R., Moreira, P., Bilbao, A., Jiménez, A., Pérez-Crespo, M., Ramírez, M. A., De Fonseca, F. R., Pintado, B., & Gutiérrez-Adán, A. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0308560101 · Cited by 370
Metadata
- Authors
- Doherty, A. S., Mann, M. R. W., Tremblay, K. D., Bartolomei, M. S., & Schultz, R. M.
- Venue
- Biology of Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-06-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1526-1535
- ISSN
- 0006-3363 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-7268
- OpenAlex
- W2103246764
- Cited by
- 722
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.