Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhanced Survivability of Cloned Calves Derived from Roscovitine-Treated Adult Somatic Cells

Gibbons, John, Arat, Sezen, Rzucidlo, Jacek, Miyoshi, Kazuchika, Waltenburg, Rachel, Respess, Donald, Venable, Alison, Stice, Steve·2002·Biology of Reproduction

Abstract

Nuclear transfer to produce cattle is inefficient because 1) donor cells are not easily synchronized in the proper phase of the cell cycle, 2) the nucleus of these cells is not effectively reprogrammed, 3) the rate of attrition of late-term pregnancies is high, and 4) the health of early postnatal calves is compromised. The cyclin dependent kinase 2 inhibitor, roscovitine, was used to maximize cell cycle synchrony and to produce cells that responded more reliably to nuclear reprogramming. Roscovitine-treated adult bovine granulosa cells (82.4%) were more efficiently synchronized (P < 0.05) in the quiescent G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle than were serum-starved cells (76.7%). Although blastocyst development following nuclear transfer was elevated (P < 0.05) in the serum-starved group (21.1%) relative to the roscovitine-treated cells (11.8%), the number of cells in the blastocysts derived from roscovitine-treated cells was higher (P < 0.05) than those derived from the serum-starved group (roscovitine-treated group: 142.8 +/- 6.0 cells; serum-starved group: 86.8 +/- 14.5 cells). The resulting fetal and calf survival after embryo transfer was enhanced in the roscovitine-treated group (seven surviving calves from six pregnancies) compared with serum-starved controls (two calves born, one surviving beyond 60 days, from five pregnancies). Roscovitine culture can predictably synchronize the donor cell cycle and increase the nuclear reprogramming capacity of the cells, resulting in enhanced fetal and calf survival and increased cloning efficiency.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1095/biolreprod66.4.895

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Metadata

Authors
Gibbons, J., Arat, S., Rzucidlo, J., Miyoshi, K., Waltenburg, R., Respess, D., Venable, A., & Stice, S.
Venue
Biology of Reproduction
Published
2002-04-01
Volume
66
Issue
4
Pages
895-900
ISSN
  • 0006-3363 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-7268
OpenAlex
W2129774305
Cited by
164
References
1
FWCI
6.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhanced Survivability of Cloned Calves Derived from Roscovitine-Treated Adult Somatic Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1095/biolreprod66.4.895
The paper
Gibbons, J., Arat, S., Rzucidlo, J., Miyoshi, K., Waltenburg, R., Respess, D., Venable, A., & Stice, S. (2002). Enhanced Survivability of Cloned Calves Derived from Roscovitine-Treated Adult Somatic Cells. Biology of Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod66.4.895

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.