The Hill equation revisited: uses and misuses
Abstract
The Hill coefficient is commonly used to estimate the number of ligand molecules that are required to bind to a receptor to produce a functional effect. However, for a receptor with more than one ligand binding site, the Hill equation does not reflect a physically possible reaction scheme; only under the very specific condition of marked positive cooperativity does the Hill coefficient accurately estimate the number of binding sites. The Hill coefficient is best thought of as an “interaction” coefficient, reflecting the extent of cooperativity among multiple ligand binding sites. Several relatively simple, physically plausible reaction schemes are shown here to produce a variety of ligand dose‐response curve phenotypes more appropriately suited to modeling ligand–receptor interactions, especially if independent information about the stochiometry of the ligand–receptor interaction is available.—Weiss, J. N. The Hill equation revisited: uses and misuses. FASEB J. 11, 835–841 (1997)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Hill function fits stimulus-response data in a wide set of biological systems.
“This agrees with general evidence that the Hill function fits stimulus-response data in a wide set of biological systems [123–128].”
From Fibromyalgia pathogenesis explained by a neuroendocrine multistable model (2024) · cites this paper as [125]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
cGAS senses long and HMGB/TFAM-bound U-turn DNA by forming protein-DNA ladders
Andreeva, L., Hiller, B., Kostrewa, D., Lässig, C., de Oliveira Mann, C. C., Jan Drexler, D., Maiser, A., Gaidt, M., Leonhardt, H., Hornung, V., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23890 · Cited by 511 · see citing works
Scimemi, A., & Diamond, J. S. (2012) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3827-12.2012 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Novel kinetic studies on biomass hydrothermal carbonization
Gallifuoco, A., & Di Giacomo, G. (2018) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.087 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Fibromyalgia pathogenesis explained by a neuroendocrine multistable model
Demori, I., Losacco, S., Giordano, G., Mucci, V., Blanchini, F., & Burlando, B. (2024) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0303573 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Weiss, J. N.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Weiss, James N.
- ORCID
- Weiss, James N.
- Venue
- The FASEB Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 835-841
- ISSN
- 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6860
- OpenAlex
- W2107208446
- Cited by
- 1,000
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 48 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 2.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The FASEB Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01hl036729-11)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P50HL052319, P50HL52319, R01 HL-36729)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Hemoglobin structure and function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
- Keywords
- Hill coefficient, Hill equation, positive cooperativity, ligand binding sites, ligand-receptor interactions, dose-response curves, binding stoichiometry, reaction scheme, receptor activation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Binding Sites, Humans, Kinetics, Ligands, Receptors, Cell Surface
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review