The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biological responses to electromagnetic fields 1
Abstract
Electrification in developed countries has progressively increased the mean level of extremely low‐frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF‐EMFs) to which populations are exposed; these humanmade fields are substantially above the naturally occurring ambient electric and magnetic fields of ~10 ‐3 Vm ‐1 and ~10 ‐13 T, respectively. Several epidemiological studies have concluded that ELF‐EMFs may be linked to an increased risk of cancer, particularly childhood leukemia. These observations have been reinforced by cellular studies reporting EMF‐induced effects on biological systems, most notably on the activity of components of the pathways that regulate cell proliferation. However, the limited number of attempts to directly replicate these experimental findings have been almost uniformly unsuccessful, and no EMF‐induced biological response has yet been replicated in independent laboratories. Many of the most well‐defined effects have come from gene expression studies; several attempts have been made recently to repeat these key findings. This review analyses these studies and summarizes other reports of major cellular responses to EMFs and the published attempts at replication. The opening sections discuss quantitative aspects of exposure to EMFs and the incidence of cancers that have been correlated with such fields. The concluding section considers the problems that confront research in this area and suggests feasible strategies.—Lacy‐hulbert, A., Metcalfe, J. C., Hesketh, R. Biological responses to electromagnetic fields. FASEB J . 12, 395–420 (1998)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ELECTRICAL FORCES FOR MICROSCALE CELL MANIPULATION
Voldman, J. (2006) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.8.061505.095739 · Cited by 892
Stimulation of Growth Factor Synthesis by Electric and Electromagnetic Fields
Aaron, R. K., Boyan, B. D., Ciombor, D. M., Schwartz, Z., & Simon, B. J. (2004) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/00003086-200402000-00006 · Cited by 270
Magnetic field effects in biology from the perspective of the radical pair mechanism
Zadeh-Haghighi, H., & Simon, C. (2022) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2022.0325 · Cited by 197
Metadata
- Authors
- Lacy‐hulbert, A., Metcalfe, J. C., & Hesketh, R.
- Venue
- The FASEB Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 395-420
- ISSN
- 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6860
- OpenAlex
- W1959834892
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biological responses to electromagnetic fields 1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1096/fasebj.12.6.395
- The paper
- Lacy‐hulbert, A., Metcalfe, J. C., & Hesketh, R. (1998). Biological responses to electromagnetic fields 1. The FASEB Journal. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.12.6.395
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.