Cited by 1

Coordinated maintenance of the size control of muscle cells by AMP‐activated protein kinase

Lantier, Louise, Mounier, Rémi, Leclerc, Jocelyne, Melki, Judith, Pende, Mario, Bertrand, Luc, Foretz, Marc, Viollet, Benoit·2010·The FASEB Journal

Abstract

Skeletal muscle mass is regulated by signaling pathways that govern protein synthesis and cell proliferation, the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) playing a key role in these processes. Recent studies have suggested the crucial role of AMP‐activated protein kinase (AMPK) in the inhibition of protein synthesis and cell growth. Here, we address the role of AMPK in the regulation of muscle cell size in vitro and in vivo . The size of myotubes lacking both AMPKα1 and α2 catalytic subunits was 1.5‐fold higher than for controls. A marked increase in p70S6K Thr389 and rpS6 Ser235/236 phosphorylation was observed concomitant with an up‐regulation of protein synthesis rate. Inhibition of mTOR pathway by AMPK activators (AICAR, metformin, A‐769662) was blunted and was correlated with altered raptor phosphorylation. However, treatment with rapamycin prevented both p70S6K phosphorylation and cell hypertrophy. Moreover, in skeletal muscle‐specific deficient AMPKα1/α2 KO mice, soleus muscle showed a higher mass with myofibers of larger size and was correlated with enhanced p70S6K and rpS6 phosphorylation. Our results demonstrate the cross talk between AMPK and mTOR/p70S6K pathways in muscle cell size control. ANR‐06‐PHYSIO‐026

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fasebj.24.1_supplement.801.22

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies in cell culture and animal models provide compelling evidence for cross-talk between AMPK and mTOR signaling pathways, and support the notion that activation of AMPK-related pathways suppresses translation through decreased S6K and 4E-BP phosphorylation.

    “Studies in cell culture and animal models provide compelling evidence for the cross-talk between AMPK and mTOR signaling pathways, and support the notion that activation of AMPK-related pathways suppresses translation through decreased S6K and 4E-BP phosphorylation (Bolster et al., 2002;Thomson et al., 2008;Lantier et al., 2010;Egawa et al., 2014).”

    From Concurrent exercise training: do opposites distract? (2017) · cites this paper as Lantier et al., 2010

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lantier, L., Mounier, R., Leclerc, J., Melki, J., Pende, M., Bertrand, L., Foretz, M., & Viollet, B.
Affiliations
  • Endocrinology Metabolism and Cancer Inserm U567 Paris France Metropolitan
  • INSERM GENOPOLE Evry France Metropolitan
  • Inserm U845 Paris France Metropolitan
  • CARD Univ Catholique De Louvain Brussels Belgium
Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-04
Volume
24
Issue
S1
ISSN
  • 0892-6638
  • 1530-6860
Cited by
0
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review