Cited by 28

Skin Carotenoids as Biomarker for Vegetable and Fruit Intake: Validation of the Reflection‐Spectroscopy Based “Veggie Meter”

Ermakov, Igor V, Whigham, Leah D, Redelfs, Alisha H, Jahns, Lisa, Stookey, Jodi, Bernstein, Paul S, Gellermann, Werner·2016·The FASEB Journal

Abstract

Skin is a relatively stable storage medium for carotenoids; non‐invasive optical measurements of carotenoids in this tissue via Resonance Raman spectroscopy (RRS) serve as a non‐invasive biomarker for fruit and vegetable (F/V) intake. The RRS method has been validated with HPLC‐based measurements of carotenoid concentrations in serum and excised skin tissue samples and has been shown in feeding studies to respond to changes in F/V intake. An attractive alternative to RRS is based on reflection spectroscopy (RS), which requires less complex instrumentation and has an advantage in also measuring skin melanin and hemoglobin absorptions. Using a suitable algorithm, the latter can be taken into account in the RS‐based derivation of skin carotenoid levels. Furthermore, these levels can be quantified in optical density units, which directly correlate with the carotenoid concentrations encountered in the measured tissue volume. The objective of this study was to validate the RS method via comparison with the RRS method. We compared RS and RRS measurements in 5 diverse human subject cohorts of different age groups and ethnicities in community and clinical settings. These measurements included inter‐subject comparisons of carotenoid levels in 146 adults and children, tracking of carotenoid changes in response to dietary interventions in 29 adults, and an ongoing exploration of a potential correlation between skin and retinal carotenoid levels in adult patients with vision disorders. Depending on the particular study, correlation coefficients varied between R ~ 0.80 and 0.96, showing that the RS method provides a valid substitute for RRS in skin carotenoid measurements of all age groups. A compact, portable instrument configuration will be presented, which permits rapid non‐invasive measurement and tracking of F/V derived carotenoid levels. In its capacity as “Veggie Meter” it should be attractive for screening of large populations and the assessment of the effectiveness of F/V intake interventions. Support or Funding Information Support for this research was provided in part by the Paso del Norte Health Foundation and the USDA‐ARS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fasebj.30.1_supplement.409.3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ermakov, I. V., Whigham, L. D., Redelfs, A. H., Jahns, L., Stookey, J., Bernstein, P. S., & Gellermann, W.
Affiliations
  • Image Technologies Corporation Salt Lake City UT
  • Paso del Norte Institute for Healthy Living El Paso TX
  • USDA‐ARS Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center Grand Forks ND
  • Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Section, Epidemiology Unit San Francisco Department of Public Health Child Care Health Program San Francisco CA
  • Moran Eye Center University of Utah Salt Lake City UT
Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-04
Volume
30
Issue
S1
ISSN
  • 0892-6638
  • 1530-6860
Cited by
28
References
0
Language
en
Funders
U.S. Department of Agriculture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review