The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measurement of nitric oxide in biological models
Abstract
Nitric oxide (NO) is a small, gaseous, paramagnetic radical with a high affinity for interaction with ferrous hemoproteins such as soluble guanylate cyclase and hemoglobin. Interest in NO measurement increased exponentially with the discovery that NO or a related compound is the endothelium‐derived relaxing factor (EDRF). In addition to being a potent endogenous vasodilator, NO has a role in inflammation, thrombosis, immunity, and neurotransmission. Measurement of NO is important as many of its effects (e.g., vasodilatation, inhibition of platelet aggregation) are similar to those of other substances produced by the endothelium, such as prostacyclin. NO is formed in small amounts in vivo and is rapidly destroyed by interaction with oxygen, making measurement difficult. A computerized search of the past five year's literature found NO measurements reported in fewer than 50 of 955 articles dealing with EDRF. Inhibitors of NO synthesis such as the arginine analogs or agents that inactivate NO, such as reduced hemoglobin, are commonly used as specific probes for NO, in vivo and in vitro; however, none of the NO inhibitors is completely specific. The most widely used assays use one of three strategies to detect NO: 1) NO is “trapped” by nitroso compounds, or reduced hemoglobin, forming a stable adduct that is detected by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) (detection threshold ≈ 1 nmol); 2 ) NO oxidizes reduced hemoglobin to methemoglobin, which is detected by spectrophotometry (detection threshold ≈ 1 nmol); 3 ) NO interacts with ozone producing light, “chemiluminescence” (detection threshold ≈ 20 pmol). These assays can be performed to exclusively detect NO, or by adding acid and reducing agents to the sample, can measure NO and related oxides of nitrogen such as nitrite. Several new amperometric microelectrode assays offer the potential to measure smaller amounts of NO (10 –20 M), permitting NO measurement in intact issues and from single cells. This review describes the pharmacology and toxicology of NO and reviews the major techniques for measuring NO in biological models.— Archer, S. Measurement of nitric oxide in biological models. FASEB J. 7: 349‐360; 1993.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease
Valko, M., Leibfritz, D., Moncol, J., Cronin, M. T. D., Mazur, M., & Telser, J. (2007) · The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2006.07.001 · Cited by 14,269
Free radicals, metals and antioxidants in oxidative stress-induced cancer
Valko, M., Rhodes, C. J., Moncol, J., Izakovic, M., & Mazur, M. (2006) · Chemico-Biological Interactions · doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2005.12.009 · Cited by 6,680
Increased amount of nitric oxide in exhaled air of asthmatics
Alving, K., Weitzberg, E., & Lundberg, J. (1993) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.93.06091368 · Cited by 1,232
Brown, G. C., & Cooper, C. E. (1994) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/0014-5793(94)01290-3 · Cited by 1,055
Tsikas, D. (2007) · Journal of Chromatography B · doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.07.054 · Cited by 893
Metadata
- Authors
- Archer, S.
- Venue
- The FASEB Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-02
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 349-360
- ISSN
- 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6860
- OpenAlex
- W1947666932
- Cited by
- 926
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement of nitric oxide in biological models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1096/fasebj.7.2.8440411
- The paper
- Archer, S. (1993). Measurement of nitric oxide in biological models. The FASEB Journal. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.7.2.8440411
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.