Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,590

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Principles of Scientific Management

Open access
·1993·The FASEB Journal

Abstract

the place of informed leadership coupled with general fiscal difficulties are hindering realization of knowledge and benefit to society.The solution requires more than the corporate mold of The increasing politicization of the support of science has awakened many a scientist to the risks and realities of survival as an investigator and to the threats to the future of science.Effective management and wise leadership of the scientific enterprise are necessary solutions to the dilemma.Sir Walter Bodmer shares his perspective regarding the principles of successful scientific management from his experience in leading the Imperial Cancer Research Fund (ICRF) as well as his being in the forefront of science.Yes! Management is necessary.But to be effective it must not displace leadership or the recognition and pursuit of excellence.It must be nonintrusive.Naive management imperatives in management.It must encompass a variety of actions based in the fundamental principle that management supports the optimal conduct of science.Dr. Bodmer guides us through these principles with clarity, experience, and vision.The principles of excellence, balance, and strategic insight have each been key ingredients in the success of the ICRF and are applicable at large.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fasebj.7.9.8330677

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,590

Metadata

Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-06
Volume
7
Issue
9
Pages
723-729
ISSN
  • 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6860
OpenAlex
W1762094362
Cited by
1,590
References
0
FWCI
205.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Principles of Scientific Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1096/fasebj.7.9.8330677
The paper
Principles of Scientific Management. (1993). The FASEB Journal. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.7.9.8330677

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.