The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Principles of Scientific Management
Open accessAbstract
the place of informed leadership coupled with general fiscal difficulties are hindering realization of knowledge and benefit to society.The solution requires more than the corporate mold of The increasing politicization of the support of science has awakened many a scientist to the risks and realities of survival as an investigator and to the threats to the future of science.Effective management and wise leadership of the scientific enterprise are necessary solutions to the dilemma.Sir Walter Bodmer shares his perspective regarding the principles of successful scientific management from his experience in leading the Imperial Cancer Research Fund (ICRF) as well as his being in the forefront of science.Yes! Management is necessary.But to be effective it must not displace leadership or the recognition and pursuit of excellence.It must be nonintrusive.Naive management imperatives in management.It must encompass a variety of actions based in the fundamental principle that management supports the optimal conduct of science.Dr. Bodmer guides us through these principles with clarity, experience, and vision.The principles of excellence, balance, and strategic insight have each been key ingredients in the success of the ICRF and are applicable at large.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Human resources and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based perspective
Wright, P. M., McMahan, G. C., & McWilliams, A. (1994) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585199400000020 · Cited by 2,017
Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering
Baxter, G., & Sommerville, I. (2011) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2010.07.003 · Cited by 1,642
The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision
Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511895555 · Cited by 1,347
Followership theory: A review and research agenda
Uhl-Bien, M., Riggio, R. E., Lowe, K. B., & Carsten, M. K. (2014) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.007 · Cited by 1,213
The transport geography of logistics and freight distribution
Hesse, M., & Rodrigue, J.-P. (2004) · Journal of Transport Geography · doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.12.004 · Cited by 894
Metadata
- Venue
- The FASEB Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 723-729
- ISSN
- 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6860
- OpenAlex
- W1762094362
- Cited by
- 1,590
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 205.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Principles of Scientific Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1096/fasebj.7.9.8330677
- The paper
- Principles of Scientific Management. (1993). The FASEB Journal. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.7.9.8330677
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.