The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Monocyte chemotactic proteins MCP‐1, MCP‐2, and MCP‐3 are major attractants for human CD4 + and CD8 + T lymphocytes
Abstract
The responses of lymphocytes to six CC chemokines–MCP‐1, MCP‐2, MCP‐3, MIP‐1α, MIP‐1β, and RANTES–were studied using cloned human CD4 + and CD8 + T cells. All CC chemokines tested induced migration of both types of lymphocytes, whereas two CXC chemokines used as controls, IL‐8 and IP‐10, were inactive. The monocyte chemotactic proteins (MCP‐1, MCP‐2, and MCP‐3) showed a typically bimodal concentration dependence, and were considerably more effective than MIP‐1α, MIP‐10, or RANTES. All CC chemokines also induced a rapid and transient rise in cytosolic free Ca 2+ in either type of T cell. The rise was prevented by Bordetella pertussis toxin treatment, indicating that G‐protein‐coupled receptors are involved in signaling. It was most pronounced with MCP‐1 and MCP‐3, which is in agreement with the efficacy of these chemokines as chemoattractants. The responses to MCP‐2, MIP‐1α, MIP‐1β, and RANTES were weaker, and no changes were obtained on stimulation with IL‐8 or IP‐10. Freshly isolated human blood lymphocytes were also tested, but neither migration nor Ca 2+ changes were observed. Low numbers of high‐affinity receptors for MCP‐1 were found on CD4 + and CD8+ cells (<900 per cell, K d <1 nM), and desensitization experiments showed that MCP‐1, MCP‐2, and MCP‐3 share receptors. Owing to their superior effectiveness on CD4 + and CD8 + T cells, the monocyte chemotactic proteins could play a major role in the recruitment of activated T lymphocytes.—Loetscher, P., Seitz, M., Clark‐Lewis, I., Baggiolini, M., Moser, B. Monocyte chemotactic proteins MCP‐1, MCP‐2, and MCP‐3 are major attractants for human CD4 + and CD8 + T lymphocytes. FASEB J. 8: 1055‐1060; 1994.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Engelhardt, E., Toksoy, A., Goebeler, M., Debus, S., Bröcker, E.-B., & Gillitzer, R. (1998) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9440(10)65699-4 · Cited by 435
Nagasawa, T., Inada, Y., Nakano, S., Tamura, T., Takahashi, T., Maruyama, K., Yamazaki, Y., Kuroda, J., & Shibata, N. (2006) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.02.028 · Cited by 233
Seiffert, K., Ding, W., Wagner, J. A., & Granstein, R. D. (2006) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/sj.jid.5700135 · Cited by 62
p53 is an important regulator of CCL2 gene expression
Tang, X., Asano, M., O’Reilly, A., Farquhar, A., Yang, Y., & Amar, S. (2012) · Current Molecular Medicine · doi:10.2174/156652412802480844 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Loetscher, P., Seitz, M., Lewis, I. C., Baggiolini, M., & Moser, B.
- Venue
- The FASEB Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-10
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1055-1060
- ISSN
- 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6860
- OpenAlex
- W1557678369
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.