Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 218

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bioreactors mediate the effectiveness of tissue engineering scaffolds

Pei, Ming, Solchaga, Luis A., Seidel, Joachim, Zeng, Li, Vunjak‐Novakovic, Gordana, Caplan, Arnold I., Freed, Lisa E.·2002·The FASEB Journal

Abstract

We hypothesized that the mechanically active environment present in rotating bioreactors mediates the effectiveness of three‐dimensional (3D) scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Cartilaginous constructs were engineered by using bovine calf chondrocytes in conjunction with two scaffold materials (SM) (benzylated hyaluronan and polyglycolic acid); three scaffold structures (SS) (sponge, non‐woven mesh, and composite woven/non‐woven mesh); and two culture systems (CS) (a bioreactor system and petri dishes). Construct size, composition [cells, glycosaminoglycans (GAG), total collagen, and type‐specific collagen mRNA expression and protein levels], and mechanical function (compressive modulus) were assessed, and individual and interactive effects of model system parameters (SM, SS, CS, SM∗CS and SS∗CS) were demonstrated. The CS affected cell seeding (higher yields of more spatially uniform cells were obtained in bioreactor‐grown than dish‐grown 3‐day constructs) and subsequently affected chondrogenesis (higher cell numbers, wet weights, wet weight GAG fractions, and collagen type II levels were obtained in bioreactor‐grown than dish‐grown 1‐month constructs). In bioreactors, mesh‐based scaffolds yielded 1‐month constructs with lower type I collagen levels and four‐fold higher compressive moduli than corresponding sponge‐based scaffolds. The data imply that interactions between bioreactors and 3D tissue engineering scaffolds can be utilized to improve the structure, function, and molecular properties of in vitro‐generated cartilage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fj.02-0083fje

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 218

Metadata

Authors
Pei, M., Solchaga, L. A., Seidel, J., Zeng, L., Vunjak‐Novakovic, G., Caplan, A. I., & Freed, L. E.
Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-08-07
Volume
16
Issue
12
Pages
1691-1694
ISSN
  • 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6860
OpenAlex
W2136899344
Cited by
218
References
0
FWCI
15.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bioreactors mediate the effectiveness of tissue engineering scaffolds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1096/fj.02-0083fje
The paper
Pei, M., Solchaga, L. A., Seidel, J., Zeng, L., Vunjak‐Novakovic, G., Caplan, A. I., & Freed, L. E. (2002). Bioreactors mediate the effectiveness of tissue engineering scaffolds. The FASEB Journal. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.02-0083fje

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.