The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bioreactors mediate the effectiveness of tissue engineering scaffolds
Abstract
We hypothesized that the mechanically active environment present in rotating bioreactors mediates the effectiveness of three‐dimensional (3D) scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Cartilaginous constructs were engineered by using bovine calf chondrocytes in conjunction with two scaffold materials (SM) (benzylated hyaluronan and polyglycolic acid); three scaffold structures (SS) (sponge, non‐woven mesh, and composite woven/non‐woven mesh); and two culture systems (CS) (a bioreactor system and petri dishes). Construct size, composition [cells, glycosaminoglycans (GAG), total collagen, and type‐specific collagen mRNA expression and protein levels], and mechanical function (compressive modulus) were assessed, and individual and interactive effects of model system parameters (SM, SS, CS, SM∗CS and SS∗CS) were demonstrated. The CS affected cell seeding (higher yields of more spatially uniform cells were obtained in bioreactor‐grown than dish‐grown 3‐day constructs) and subsequently affected chondrogenesis (higher cell numbers, wet weights, wet weight GAG fractions, and collagen type II levels were obtained in bioreactor‐grown than dish‐grown 1‐month constructs). In bioreactors, mesh‐based scaffolds yielded 1‐month constructs with lower type I collagen levels and four‐fold higher compressive moduli than corresponding sponge‐based scaffolds. The data imply that interactions between bioreactors and 3D tissue engineering scaffolds can be utilized to improve the structure, function, and molecular properties of in vitro‐generated cartilage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chung, C., & Burdick, J. A. (2008) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.027 · Cited by 760
Small-Diameter Artificial Arteries Engineered In Vitro
Isenberg, B. C., Williams, C., & Tranquillo, R. T. (2006) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/01.res.0000196867.12470.84 · Cited by 469
Chitosan scaffolds: Interconnective pore size and cartilage engineering
GRIFFON, D., SEDIGHI, M., SCHAEFFER, D., EURELL, J., & JOHNSON, A. (2006) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2005.12.007 · Cited by 351
Mauck, R. L., Wang, C. C.-B., Oswald, E. S., Ateshian, G. A., & Hung, C. T. (2003) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2003.08.006 · Cited by 310
Zhao, F., & Ma, T. (2005) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.20532 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Pei, M., Solchaga, L. A., Seidel, J., Zeng, L., Vunjak‐Novakovic, G., Caplan, A. I., & Freed, L. E.
- Venue
- The FASEB Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-08-07
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1691-1694
- ISSN
- 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6860
- OpenAlex
- W2136899344
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bioreactors mediate the effectiveness of tissue engineering scaffolds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1096/fj.02-0083fje
- The paper
- Pei, M., Solchaga, L. A., Seidel, J., Zeng, L., Vunjak‐Novakovic, G., Caplan, A. I., & Freed, L. E. (2002). Bioreactors mediate the effectiveness of tissue engineering scaffolds. The FASEB Journal. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.02-0083fje
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.