Cited by 111Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsBarrier Structure and Function StudiesNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Aβ peptide immunization restores blood‐brain barrier integrity in Alzheimer disease

Abstract

Immunization with amyloid beta (Abeta) peptides or passive immunization with antibodies against Abeta has been reported to reduce plaque burden, neuritic dystrophy, early Tau pathology, microgliosis as well as reversing learning and memory deficits. This has created a central paradox: how does vaccination in peripheral tissues reduce plaque burden in the brain? No single explanation for these phenomena has yet been presented. To reconcile these observations, we demonstrate that the integrity of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), a structural barrier between the brain and the blood, is compromised in Tg2576 Alzheimer disease (AD) model mice. We immunized Tg2576 mice with Abeta before and after the onset of AD-type neuropathology and observed that BBB permeability, amyloid burden, and microgliosis are decreased in immunized mice. It is concluded that the integrity of the BBB is disrupted in AD mice, and after Abeta immunization the immune system clears Abeta from sources in the brain as it would in peripheral organs lacking barriers. Once Abeta is removed, the integrity of the BBB is restored. The data therefore provide an intellectual framework for understanding how the immune system can clear amyloid deposits from AD brains and suggest new strategies for limiting disease progression in amyloidopathies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fj.05-3956com

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 52 references

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–111 of 111

Metadata

Authors
Dickstein, D. L., Biron, K. E., Ujiie, M., Pfeifer, C. G., Jeffries, A. R., & Jefferies, W. A.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-03
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
426-433
ISSN
  • 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6860
OpenAlex
W2021255508
Cited by
111
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2006-07-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The FASEB Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
amyloid-beta immunization, blood-brain barrier integrity, Alzheimer's disease, Tg2576 mice, blood-brain barrier permeability, amyloid plaque clearance, microglial activation, amyloid pathology, neuroinflammation
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Antibodies, Blood-Brain Barrier, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Humans, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Organ Specificity, Peptide Fragments, Vaccination, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Microglia, Mice, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review