The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preclinical screening of anti‐HER2 nanobodies for molecular imaging of breast cancer
Abstract
Accurate determination of tumor human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐status in breast cancer patients is possible via noninvasive imaging, provided adequate tracers are used. In this study, we describe the generation of a panel of 38 nanobodies, small HER2‐binding fragments that are derived from heavy‐chain‐only antibodies raised in an immunized dromedary. In search of a lead compound, a subset of nanobodies was biochemically characterized in depth and preclinically tested for use as tracers for imaging of xenografted tumors. The selected compound, 2Rs15d, was found to be stable and to interact specifically with HER2 recombinant protein and HER2‐expressing cells in ELISA, surface plasmon resonance, flow cytometry, and radioligand binding studies with low nanomolar affinities, and did not compete with anti‐HER2 therapeutic antibodies trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Single‐photon‐emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging quantification and biodistribution analyses showed that 99m Tc‐labeled 2Rs15d has a high tumor uptake in 2 HER2 + tumor models, fast blood clearance, low accumulation in nontarget organs except kidneys, and high concomitant tumor‐to‐blood and tumor‐to‐muscle ratios at 1 h after intravenous injection. These values were dramatically lower for an irrelevant control 99m Tc‐nanobody and for 99m Tc‐2Rs15d targeting a HER2 – tumor.—Vaneycken, I., Devoogdt, N., Van Gassen, N., Vincke, C., Xavier, C., Wernery, U., Muyldermans, S., Lahoutte, T., Caveliers, V. Preclinical screening of anti‐HER2 nanobodies for molecular imaging of breast cancer. FASEB J. 25, 2433–2446 (2011). www.fasebj.org
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Naturally occurring antibodies devoid of light chains
Hamers-Casterman, C., Atarhouch, T., Muyldermans, S., Robinson, G., Hammers, C., Songa, E. B., Bendahman, N., & Hammers, R. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/363446a0 · Cited by 3,241
Self-citationProperties, production, and applications of camelid single-domain antibody fragments
Harmsen, M. M., & De Haard, H. J. (2007) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-007-1142-2 · Cited by 809
Cited by
Nanobodies: natural single-domain antibodies
Muyldermans, S. (2013) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-063011-092449 · Cited by 2,304
Self-citationPhase I Study of 68Ga-HER2-Nanobody for PET/CT Assessment of HER2 Expression in Breast Carcinoma
Keyaerts, M., Xavier, C., Heemskerk, J., Devoogdt, N., Everaert, H., Ackaert, C., Vanhoeij, M., Duhoux, F. P., Gevaert, T., Simon, P., et al. (2016) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.115.162024 · Cited by 429
Self-citationRadiolabeled nanobodies as theranostic tools in targeted radionuclide therapy of cancer
D’Huyvetter, M., Xavier, C., Caveliers, V., Lahoutte, T., Muyldermans, S., & Devoogdt, N. (2014) · Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery · doi:10.1517/17425247.2014.941803 · Cited by 124
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Vaneycken, I., Devoogdt, N., Van Gassen, N., Vincke, C., Xavier, C., Wernery, U., Muyldermans, S., Lahoutte, T., & Caveliers, V.
- Venue
- The FASEB Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-04-08
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2433-2446
- ISSN
- 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6860
- OpenAlex
- W2098231819
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preclinical screening of anti‐HER2 nanobodies for molecular imaging of breast cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1096/fj.10-180331
- The paper
- Vaneycken, I., Devoogdt, N., Van Gassen, N., Vincke, C., Xavier, C., Wernery, U., Muyldermans, S., Lahoutte, T., & Caveliers, V. (2011). Preclinical screening of anti‐HER2 nanobodies for molecular imaging of breast cancer. The FASEB Journal. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.10-180331
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.