The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phase I Study of 68Ga-HER2-Nanobody for PET/CT Assessment of HER2 Expression in Breast Carcinoma
Open accessAbstract
UNLABELLED: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status is one of the major tumor characteristics in breast cancer to guide therapy. Anti-HER2 treatment has clear survival advantages in HER2-positive breast carcinoma patients. Heterogeneity in HER2 expression between primary tumor and metastasis has repeatedly been described, resulting in the need to reassess HER2 status during the disease course. To avoid repeated biopsy with potential bias due to tumor heterogeneity, Nanobodies directed against HER2 have been developed as probes for molecular imaging. Nanobodies, which are derived from unique heavy-chain-only antibodies, are the smallest antigen-binding antibody fragments and have ideal characteristics for PET imaging. The primary aims were assessment of safety, biodistribution, and dosimetry. The secondary aim was to investigate tumor-targeting potential. METHODS: In total, 20 women with primary or metastatic breast carcinoma (score of 2+ or 3+ on HER2 immunohistochemical assessment) were included. Anti-HER2-Nanobody was labeled with (68)Ga via a NOTA derivative. Administered activities were 53-174 MBq (average, 107 MBq). PET/CT scans for dosimetry assessment were obtained at 10, 60, and 90 min after administration. Physical evaluation and blood analysis were performed for safety evaluation. Biodistribution was analyzed for 11 organs using MIM software; dosimetry was assessed using OLINDA/EXM. Tumor-targeting potential was assessed in primary and metastatic lesions. RESULTS: No adverse reactions occurred. A fast blood clearance was observed, with only 10% of injected activity remaining in the blood at 1 h after injection. Uptake was seen mainly in the kidneys, liver, and intestines. The effective dose was 0.043 mSv/MBq, resulting in an average of 4.6 mSv per patient. The critical organ was the urinary bladder wall, with a dose of 0.406 mGy/MBq. In patients with metastatic disease, tracer accumulation well above the background level was demonstrated in most identified sites of disease. Primary lesions were more variable in tracer accumulation. CONCLUSION: (68)Ga-HER2-Nanobody PET/CT is a safe procedure with a radiation dose comparable to other routinely used PET tracers. Its biodistribution is favorable, with the highest uptake in the kidneys, liver, and intestines but very low background levels in all other organs that typically house primary breast carcinoma or tumor metastasis. Tracer accumulation in HER2-positive metastases is high, compared with normal surrounding tissues, and warrants further assessment in a phase II trial.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Slamon, D. J., Leyland-Jones, B., Shak, S., Fuchs, H., Paton, V., Bajamonde, A., Fleming, T., Eiermann, W., Wolter, J., Pegram, M., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200103153441101 · Cited by 11,500
3rd ESO–ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 3)
Cardoso, F., Costa, A., Senkus, E., Aapro, M., André, F., Barrios, C. H., Bergh, J., Bhattacharyya, G., Biganzoli, L., Cardoso, M. J., et al. (2017) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdw544 · Cited by 2,033
Stabin, M. G., Sparks, R. B., & Crowe, E. A. (2005) · PubMed · Cited by 1,350
Afshar-Oromieh, A., Malcher, A., Eder, M., Eisenhut, M., Linhart, H. G., Hadaschik, B. A., Holland-Letz, T., Giesel, F. L., Kratochwil, C., Haufe, S., et al. (2013) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-012-2298-2 · Cited by 915
Dijkers, E. C., Oude Munnink, T. H., Kosterink, J. G., Brouwers, A. H., Jager, P. L., de Jong, J. R., van Dongen, G. A., Schröder, C. P., Lub-de Hooge, M. N., & de Vries, E. G. (2010) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1038/clpt.2010.12 · Cited by 805
ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2)
Cardoso, F., Costa, A., Norton, L., Senkus, E., Aapro, M., André, F., Barrios, C. H., Bergh, J., Biganzoli, L., Blackwell, K. L., et al. (2014) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu385 · Cited by 540 · cited 1×
“Because of this discordance, the European guidelines now recommend that a biopsy of a metastatic lesion be obtained to reassess biologic markers (11).”
BackgroundSzabo, Z., Mena, E., Rowe, S. P., Plyku, D., Nidal, R., Eisenberger, M. A., Antonarakis, E. S., Fan, H., Dannals, R. F., Chen, Y., et al. (2015) · Molecular Imaging and Biology · doi:10.1007/s11307-015-0850-8 · Cited by 443
Hurvitz, S. A., Dirix, L., Kocsis, J., Bianchi, G. V., Lu, J., Vinholes, J., Guardino, E., Song, C., Tong, B., Ng, V., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.44.9694 · Cited by 392
ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2)
Cardoso, F., Costa, A., Norton, L., Senkus, E., Aapro, M., André, F., Barrios, C. H., Bergh, J., Biganzoli, L., Blackwell, K. L., et al. (2014) · The Breast · doi:10.1016/j.breast.2014.08.009 · Cited by 338
Preclinical screening of anti‐HER2 nanobodies for molecular imaging of breast cancer
Vaneycken, I., Devoogdt, N., Van Gassen, N., Vincke, C., Xavier, C., Wernery, U., Muyldermans, S., Lahoutte, T., & Caveliers, V. (2011) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.10-180331 · Cited by 315
Self-citation
Cited by
The therapeutic potential of nanobodies
Jovčevska, I., & Muyldermans, S. (2020) · BioDrugs · doi:10.1007/s40259-019-00392-z · Cited by 749
Bridging Bio–Nano Science and Cancer Nanomedicine
Björnmalm, M., Thurecht, K. J., Michael, M., Scott, A. M., & Caruso, F. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b04855 · Cited by 382
Bartelink, I. H., Jones, E. F., Shahidi‐Latham, S. K., Lee, P. R. E., Zheng, Y., Vicini, P., van ‘t Veer, L., Wolf, D., Iagaru, A., Kroetz, D. L., et al. (2019) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/cpt.1211 · Cited by 96
Role of imaging in the era of precision medicine
Giardino, A., Gupta, S., Olson, E., Sepulveda, K., Lenchik, L., Ivanidze, J., Rakow-Penner, R., Patel, M. J., Subramaniam, R. M., & Ganeshan, D. (2017) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2016.11.021 · Cited by 87
Advances in the production and batch reformatting of phage antibody libraries
Reader, R. H., Workman, R. G., Maddison, B. C., & Gough, K. C. (2019) · Molecular Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s12033-019-00207-0 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Keyaerts, M., Xavier, C., Heemskerk, J., Devoogdt, N., Everaert, H., Ackaert, C., Vanhoeij, M., Duhoux, F. P., Gevaert, T., Simon, P., Schallier, D., Fontaine, C., Vaneycken, I., Vanhove, C., De Greve, J., Lamote, J., Caveliers, V., & Lahoutte, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Nuclear Medicine
- Publisher
- Society of Nuclear Medicine
- Published
- 2015-10-08
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-33
- ISSN
- 0161-5505 (ISSN-L)
- 2159-662X
- OpenAlex
- W2226721696
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 20.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase I Study of 68Ga-HER2-Nanobody for PET/CT Assessment of HER2 Expression in Breast Carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2967/jnumed.115.162024
- The paper
- Keyaerts, M., Xavier, C., Heemskerk, J., Devoogdt, N., Everaert, H., Ackaert, C., Vanhoeij, M., Duhoux, F. P., Gevaert, T., Simon, P., Schallier, D., Fontaine, C., Vaneycken, I., Vanhove, C., De Greve, J., Lamote, J., Caveliers, V., & Lahoutte, T. (2016). Phase I Study of 68Ga-HER2-Nanobody for PET/CT Assessment of HER2 Expression in Breast Carcinoma. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.162024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.