The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lack of tissue renewal in human adult Achilles tendon is revealed by nuclear bomb 14 C
Open accessAbstract
Tendons are often injured and heal poorly. Whether this is caused by a slow tissue turnover is unknown, since existing data provide diverging estimates of tendon protein half‐life that range from 2 mo to 200 yr. With the purpose of determining life‐long turnover of human tendon tissue, we used the 14 C bomb‐pulse method. This method takes advantage of the dramatic increase in atmospheric levels of 14 C, produced by nuclear bomb tests in 1955–1963, which is reflected in all living organisms. Levels of 14 C were measured in 28 forensic samples of Achilles tendon core and 4 skeletal muscle samples (donor birth years 1945–1983) with accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) and compared to known atmospheric levels to estimate tissue turnover. We found that Achilles tendon tissue retained levels of 14 C corresponding to atmospheric levels several decades before tissue sampling, demonstrating a very limited tissue turnover. The tendon concentrations of 14 C approximately reflected the atmospheric levels present during the first 17 yr of life, indicating that the tendon core is formed during height growth and is essentially not renewed thereafter. In contrast, 14 C levels in muscle indicated continuous turnover. Our observation provides a fundamental premise for understanding tendon function and pathology, and likely explains the poor regenerative capacity of tendon tissue.—Heinemeier, K. M., Schjerling, P., Heinemeier, J., Magnusson, S. P., Kjaer, M. Lack of tissue renewal in human adult Achilles tendon is revealed by nuclear bomb 14 C. FASEB J. 27, 2074–2079 (2013). www.fasebj.org
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Discussion Reporting of 14 C Data
Stuiver, M., & Polach, H. A. (1977) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/s0033822200003672 · Cited by 5,640
Miller, B. F., Olesen, J. L., Hansen, M., Døssing, S., Crameri, R. M., Welling, R. J., Langberg, H., Flyvbjerg, A., Kjaer, M., Babraj, J. A., et al. (2005) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2005.093690 · Cited by 610
Region specific patellar tendon hypertrophy in humans following resistance training
Kongsgaard, M., Reitelseder, S., Pedersen, T. G., Holm, L., Aagaard, P., Kjaer, M., & Magnusson, S. P. (2007) · Acta Physiologica · doi:10.1111/j.1748-1716.2007.01714.x · Cited by 377
Self-citation
Cited by
Bacalini, M. G., Deelen, J., Pirazzini, C., De Cecco, M., Giuliani, C., Lanzarini, C., Ravaioli, F., Marasco, E., van Heemst, D., Suchiman, H. E. D., et al. (2017) · The Journals of Gerontology: Series A · doi:10.1093/gerona/glw185 · Cited by 100
Siadat, S. M., & Ruberti, J. W. (2023) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2023.01.025 · Cited by 87
Massey, G. J., Balshaw, T. G., Maden‐Wilkinson, T. M., & Folland, J. P. (2018) · Acta Physiologica · doi:10.1111/apha.13019 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Heinemeier, K. M., Schjerling, P., Heinemeier, J., Magnusson, S. P., & Kjaer, M.
- Venue
- The FASEB Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-02-11
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2074-2079
- ISSN
- 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6860
- OpenAlex
- W2127661946
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 20.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lack of tissue renewal in human adult Achilles tendon is revealed by nuclear bomb 14 C. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1096/fj.12-225599
- The paper
- Heinemeier, K. M., Schjerling, P., Heinemeier, J., Magnusson, S. P., & Kjaer, M. (2013). Lack of tissue renewal in human adult Achilles tendon is revealed by nuclear bomb 14 C. The FASEB Journal. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.12-225599
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.