Sustained delivery of proangiogenic microRNA‐132 by nanoparticle transfection improves endothelial cell transplantation
Abstract
Transplantation of endothelial cells (ECs) for therapeutic vascularization or tissue engineering is a promising method for increasing tissue perfusion. Here, we report on a new approach for enhanced EC transplantation using targeted nanoparticle transfection to deliver proangiogenic microRNA‐132 (miR‐132) to cultured ECs before their transplantation, thereby sensitizing cells to the effects of endogenous growth factors. We synthesized biodegradable PLGA polymer nanoparticles (NPs) that were loaded with miR‐132 and coated with cyclic RGD (cRGD) peptides that target integrin αvβ3 expressed on cultured human umbilical vein ECs (HUVECs), increasing NP uptake through clathrin‐coated pits. Unlike previously reported NPs for miR delivery, these NPs slowly release RNA for several weeks. The endocytosed NPs remain in clathrin‐coated vesicles from which they mediate intracellular delivery of siRNA or miRNA. Transfection of HUVECs with miR‐132 enhances growth factor‐induced proliferation and migration in 2D culture, producing a 1.8‐ and 5‐fold increase, respectively. However, while the effects of conventional transfection were short‐lived, NP transfection produced protein knockdown and biological effects that were significantly longer in duration (≥6 d). Transfection of HUVECs with miR‐132 NP resulted in a 2‐fold increase in the number of microvessels per square millimeter compared to lipid after transplantation into immunodeficient mice and led to a higher number of mural cell‐invested vessels than control transfection. These data suggest that sustained delivery of miR‐132 encapsulated in a targeted biodegradable polymer NP is a safe and efficient strategy to improve EC transplantation and vascularization.—Devalliere, J., Chang, W. G., Andrejecsk, J. W., Abrahimi, P., Cheng, C. J., Jane‐wit, D., Saltzman, W. M., Pober, J. S. Sustained delivery of proangiogenic microRNA‐132 by nanoparticle transfection improves endothelial cell transplantation. FASEB J. 28, 908–922 (2014). www.fasebj.org
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Formulated nanoparticle-mediated miR-132 delivery into ECs can improve EC survival in vitro and EC transplantation efficiency in mice.
“formulated nanoparticle-mediated miR-132 delivery into ECs can improve EC survival in vitro and EC transplantation efficiency in mice56.”
From Neurons secrete miR-132-containing exosomes to regulate brain vascular integrity (2017) · cites this paper as [56]
Cites
Modes of resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy
Bergers, G., & Hanahan, D. (2008) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2442 · Cited by 2,953 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Many studies have suggested that actions on multiple angiogenic pathways may have a better, possibly synergistic, effect on neovascularization compared to actions that target a single growth factor-dependent pathway (46).”
BackgroundToxicity of cationic lipids and cationic polymers in gene delivery
Lv, H., Zhang, S., Wang, B., Cui, S., & Yan, J. (2006) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.04.014 · Cited by 2,286 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neurons secrete miR-132-containing exosomes to regulate brain vascular integrity
Xu, B., Zhang, Y., Du, X.-F., Li, J., Zi, H.-X., Bu, J.-W., Yan, Y., Han, H., & Du, J.-L. (2017) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2017.62 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
- Authors
- Devalliere, J., Chang, W. G., Andrejecsk, J. W., Abrahimi, P., Cheng, C. J., Jane‐wit, D., Saltzman, W. M., & Pober, J. S.
- Venue
- The FASEB Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-11-12
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 908-922
- ISSN
- 0892-6638
- 1530-6860
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (HL108684, HL085416)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review