Cited by 10Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Aortic stenosis and autonomic dysfunction: co-conspirators in syncope

Taneja, Indu, Marney, Annis, Robertson, David·2004·The American Journal of the Medical Sciences

Abstract

Autonomic dysfunction and aortic stenosis share several clinical characteristics, including, in severe cases, syncope. Both illnesses tend to manifest later in life, and most cases are idiopathic in origin. In a short period of 4 weeks, the authors noted that three patients out of 36 referrals for autonomic dysfunction also had histories of aortic valve replacement due to stenosis. In each case, similar presenting symptoms of fatigue, light-headedness, and syncope were attributed to aortic stenosis without mention of autonomic failure as a possible contributor. The authors propose that patients for whom symptoms of aortic valve stenosis are not relieved by surgical intervention may have concomitant autonomic dysfunction contributing significantly to their symptoms. Furthermore, the two conditions may comprise a dangerous combination, aortic stenosis causing physical obstruction of ventricular outflow, and autonomic dysfunction causing decreased venous return and insufficient cardiac filling. It may be beneficial for patients with aortic stenosis who present with syncope to be considered for possible autonomic dysfunction to address both potential pathophysiologies contributing to the syncope.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00000441-200405000-00030

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multifactorial mechanisms are likely in other types of cardiac syncope, e.g. aortic stenosis, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and sick sinus syndrome.

    “Similarly, multifactorial mechanisms are likely in other types of cardiac syncope, e.g. aortic stenosis, 133 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), 134 and sick sinus syndrome. 135,136”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taneja, I., Marney, A., & Robertson, D.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Robertson, David
Venue
The American Journal of the Medical Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
327
Issue
5
Pages
281-283
ISSN
0002-9629 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990948318
Cited by
10
References
10
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of the Medical Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL56693, P01HL056693)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR00095)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
aortic stenosis, autonomic dysfunction, syncope, aortic valve replacement, differential diagnosis, venous return, cardiac filling, fatigue, lightheadedness, outflow obstruction
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, Humans, Hypotension, Orthostatic, Male, Syncope, Comorbidity, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review