The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Endometrial Histopathology in Patients with Culture-proved Upper Genital Tract Infection and Laparoscopically Diagnosed Acute Salpingitis
Abstract
To define and quantitate histologic changes in the endometrium that best correlate with documented upper genital tract infection (UGTI) and laparoscopically diagnosed acute salpingitis, we studied endometrial biopsy specimens from 69 consecutive patients with clinically suspected acute pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) who underwent microbiological evaluation for UGTI and laparoscopic examination for acute salpingitis. Both UGTI and acute laparoscopically confirmed salpingitis were present in 37 patients (54%), UGTI without salpingitis in 1 (1%), salpingitis without UGTI in 11 (16%), and neither UGTI nor salpingitis in 20 (29%). Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae UGTI was found in 34 women, Escherichia coli in two patients, Peptococcus magnus in one woman, and with Streptococcus agalactiae in one woman. The following features were correlated both with UGTI and with salpingitis: presence of any neutrophils in the endometrial surface epithelium; neutrophils within gland lumens; dense subepithelial stromal lymphocytic infiltration; any stromal plasma cells; and germinal centers containing transformed lymphocytes. The simultaneous presence of five or more neutrophils per X 400 field in endometrial surface epithelium, together with one or more plasma cell per X 120 field in endometrial stroma, was the best predictor of UGTI plus salpingitis. This combination had a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 87% for predicting the diagnosis of both UGTI and laparoscopically confirmable acute salpingitis. Prospective studies are needed to assess the usefulness of these criteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The immunological anatomy of the skin
Kabashima, K., Honda, T., Ginhoux, F., & Egawa, G. (2019) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-018-0084-5 · Cited by 650
A local macrophage chemokine network sustains protective tissue-resident memory CD4 T cells
Iijima, N., & Iwasaki, A. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1257530 · Cited by 420
Ness, R. B., Soper, D. E., Holley, R. L., Peipert, J., Randall, H., Sweet, R. L., Sondheimer, S. J., Hendrix, S. L., Amortegui, A., Trucco, G., et al. (2002) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1067/mob.2002.121625 · Cited by 414
Colonization of the upper genital tract by vaginal bacterial species in nonpregnant women
Mitchell, C. M., Haick, A., Nkwopara, E., Garcia, R., Rendi, M., Agnew, K., Fredricks, D. N., & Eschenbach, D. (2015) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.043 · Cited by 388
Self-citationPathogenesis of Genital Tract Disease Due to Chlamydia trachomatis
Darville, T., & Hiltke, T. J. (2010) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/652397 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Kiviat, N. B., Wølner-Hanssen, P., Eschenbach, D. A., Wasserheit, J. N., Paavonen, J. A., Bell, T. A., Critchlow, C. W., Stamm, W. E., Moore, D. E., & Holmes, K. K.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Surgical Pathology
- Published
- 1990-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 167-175
- ISSN
- 0147-5185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2058767522
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endometrial Histopathology in Patients with Culture-proved Upper Genital Tract Infection and Laparoscopically Diagnosed Acute Salpingitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000478-199002000-00008
- The paper
- Kiviat, N. B., Wølner-Hanssen, P., Eschenbach, D. A., Wasserheit, J. N., Paavonen, J. A., Bell, T. A., Critchlow, C. W., Stamm, W. E., Moore, D. E., & Holmes, K. K. (1990). Endometrial Histopathology in Patients with Culture-proved Upper Genital Tract Infection and Laparoscopically Diagnosed Acute Salpingitis. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-199002000-00008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.