The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (SCLC): A Clinicopathologic Study of 100 Cases With Surgical Specimens
Abstract
Separation of small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) from nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) is a critical distinction to be made in the diagnosis of lung cancer. However, the diagnosis of SCLC is most commonly made on small biopsies and cytologic specimens, and practicing pathologists may not be familiar with all its morphologic guises and frequent combination with NSCLC elements, which may be seen in larger specimens. Following the most recent WHO classification of lung tumors and with the hope of identifying prognostic markers, we examined in detail the histology of 100 surgical biopsies or resections with a diagnosis of SCLC from the AFIP and pathology panel of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC). Multiple clinical and histologic features were studied by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Neuroendocrine architectural patterns, including nested and trabecular growth, with peripheral palisading and rosette formation were common in SCLC. Necrosis and apoptotic debris was prominent in all cases, but crush artifact was infrequent. Cell size in surgical biopsy specimens appears larger than in bronchoscopic biopsy specimens and occasional cells may show prominent nucleoli and vesicular nuclear chromatin, but this does not preclude the diagnosis of SCLC. A high percentage of cases (28%) showed combinations with NSCLC, with large cell carcinoma the most common, followed by adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Because of the frequency of a few scattered large cells in SCLC, we arbitrarily recommend that at least 10% of the tumor show large cell carcinoma before subclassification as combined SC/LC. However, combined SCLC is easily recognized if the additional component consists of other NSCLC subtypes such as adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma, so no percentage requirement is needed. Stage remained the only predictor of prognosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rindi, G., Klimstra, D. S., Abedi-Ardekani, B., Asa, S. L., Bosman, F. T., Brambilla, E., Busam, K. J., de Krijger, R. R., Dietel, M., El-Naggar, A. K., et al. (2018) · Modern Pathology · doi:10.1038/s41379-018-0110-y · Cited by 1,163
Self-citationLung cancer immunotherapy: progress, pitfalls, and promises
Lahiri, A., Maji, A., Potdar, P. D., Singh, N., Parikh, P., Bisht, B., Mukherjee, A., & Paul, M. K. (2023) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-023-01740-y · Cited by 1,102
Small Cell Carcinoma of the Prostate: A Morphologic and Immunohistochemical Study of 95 Cases
Wang, W., & Epstein, J. I. (2008) · American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/pas.0b013e318058a96b · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Nicholson, S. A., Beasley, M. B., Brambilla, E., Hasleton, P. S., Colby, T. V., Sheppard, M. N., Falk, R., & Travis, W. D.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Surgical Pathology
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1184-1197
- ISSN
- 0147-5185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098470537
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (SCLC): A Clinicopathologic Study of 100 Cases With Surgical Specimens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000478-200209000-00009
- The paper
- Nicholson, S. A., Beasley, M. B., Brambilla, E., Hasleton, P. S., Colby, T. V., Sheppard, M. N., Falk, R., & Travis, W. D. (2002). Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (SCLC): A Clinicopathologic Study of 100 Cases With Surgical Specimens. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-200209000-00009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.