Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 334

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple Resections) in Patients Without Malignancy: Are They All `Chronic Pancreatitis'?

Abraham, Susan C., Wilentz, Robb E., Yeo, Charles J., Sohn, Taylor A., Cameron, John L., Boitnott, John K., Hruban, Ralph H.·2003·The American Journal of Surgical Pathology

Abstract

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple resection) has evolved into a safe procedure in major high-volume medical centers for the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and refractory chronic pancreatitis. However, some Whipple resections performed for a clinical suspicion of malignancy reveal only benign disease on pathologic examination. We evaluated the frequency of such Whipple resections without tumor in a large series of pancreaticoduodenectomies and classified the diverse pancreatic and biliary tract diseases present in these specimens. Of 442 Whipple resections performed during 1999-2001, 47 (10.6%) were negative for neoplastic disease and, in 40 cases, had been performed for a clinical suspicion of malignancy. Most Whipple resections revealed benign pancreatic disease, including 8 (17%) alcohol-associated chronic pancreatitis, 4 (8.5%) gallstone-associated pancreatitis, 1 (2.1%) pancreas divisum, 6 (12.8%) "ordinary" chronic pancreatitis of unknown etiology, and 11 (23.4%) lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis. In particular, patients with lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis were all thought to harbor malignancy, whereas only 13 of 19 (68.4%) of Whipple resections showing histologically "ordinary" forms of chronic pancreatitis were performed for a clinical suspicion of malignancy. Benign biliary tract disease, including three cases of primary sclerosing cholangitis, two cases of choledocholithiasis-associated chronic biliary tract disease, and four fibroinflammatory strictures isolated to the intrapancreatic common bile duct, was a common etiology for clinically suspicious Whipple resections (22.5% of cases). Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) was a common finding among all pancreata, whether involved by pancreatitis or histologically normal. Overall, PanIN 1A/1B was present in 68.1%, PanIN 2 in 40.4%, and PanIN 3 in just 2.1%. These findings indicate that "benign but clinically suspicious" Whipple resections are relatively common in high-volume centers (9.2%) and reveal a diverse group of clinicopathologically distinctive pancreatic and biliary tract disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00000478-200301000-00012

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 334

Metadata

Authors
Abraham, S. C., Wilentz, R. E., Yeo, C. J., Sohn, T. A., Cameron, J. L., Boitnott, J. K., & Hruban, R. H.
Venue
The American Journal of Surgical Pathology
Published
2003-01
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
110-120
ISSN
0147-5185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072429788
Cited by
334
References
19
FWCI
6.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple Resections) in Patients Without Malignancy: Are They All `Chronic Pancreatitis'? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000478-200301000-00012
The paper
Abraham, S. C., Wilentz, R. E., Yeo, C. J., Sohn, T. A., Cameron, J. L., Boitnott, J. K., & Hruban, R. H. (2003). Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple Resections) in Patients Without Malignancy: Are They All `Chronic Pancreatitis'? The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-200301000-00012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.