The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hepatogastroenterology
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To investigate the role of indocyanine green (ICG) retention test in avoiding postoperative liver failure after hepatectomy for primary hepatolithiasis. METHODOLOGY: Between January, 2004 and December, 2010, 144 patients with primary hepatolithiasis undergoing hepatectomy were retrospectively selected for the study. Eighty-two of those (Group CP) were preoperatively evaluated only by Child-Pugh (CP) scoring to select candidates for hepatectomy before September, 2008. Since then ICG15 retention test was accepted for the same purpose in the remaining 62 cases (Group ICG). RESULTS: The immediate stone clearance rates were 79.27% and 80.65%, with final stone clearance rates 93.9% and 93.55% in the CP and ICG groups, respectively. Liver failure was observed significantly more in the CP (12.2%) than that in the ICG group (1.61%), (p<0.05). More hospital deaths occurred in the CP (4.88%) than in the ICG group (1.61%), although no significant difference was observed (p=0.548). The complication rate of the CP group (37.80%) was significantly higher than that of ICG group (17.74%), (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: ICG15 retention test is more effective to predict and avoid liver failure for patients with hepatolithiasis after hepatectomy than CP scoring system. It may also decrease the morbidity and mortality rate through strict selection, thus increasing operative safety.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Risk Factors for Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Critically Ill Patients
Cook, D. J., Fuller, H. D., Guyatt, G. H., Marshall, J. C., Leasa, D., Hall, R., Winton, T. L., Rutledge, F., Todd, T., Roy, P., et al. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199402103300601 · Cited by 1,010
Faller, H., Schuler, M., Richard, M., Heckl, U., Weis, J., & Küffner, R. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.40.8922 · Cited by 912
The Effect of Group Psychosocial Support on Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer
Goodwin, P. J., Leszcz, M., Ennis, M., Koopmans, J., Vincent, L., Guther, H., Drysdale, E., Hundleby, M., Chochinov, H. M., Navarro, M., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa011871 · Cited by 891
Olivares, O., Mayers, J. R., Gouirand, V., Torrence, M. E., Gicquel, T., Borge, L., Lac, S., Roques, J., Lavaut, M.-N., Berthezène, P., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms16031 · Cited by 413
Abraham, S. C., Wilentz, R. E., Yeo, C. J., Sohn, T. A., Cameron, J. L., Boitnott, J. K., & Hruban, R. H. (2003) · The American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/00000478-200301000-00012 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Venue
- Hepatogastroenterology
- Publisher
- Update Medical Publishing
- Published
- 2011-10-11
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 115
- Pages
- 782-4
- ISSN
- 0172-6390 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1921843724
- Cited by
- 1,254
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hepatogastroenterology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5754/hge11453
- The paper
- Hepatogastroenterology. (2011). Hepatogastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.5754/hge11453
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.