Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 277

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recovery Pattern and Home-Readiness After Ambulatory Surgery

Chung, Frances·1995·Anesthesia & Analgesia

Abstract

Despite increased use of ambulatory surgery, few data exist regarding patient recovery patterns and home-readiness. We prospectively identified the pattern of home-readiness, the persistent symptoms after surgery, and the factors that delay discharge after home-readiness criteria are satisfied. Five hundred patients were scored by the same investigator using the Postanesthetic Discharge Scoring System (PADSS) every 30 min, commencing 30 min after surgery, until the PADSS score was > or = 9. The same investigator telephoned each patient 24 h after discharge to administer a standardized questionnaire so that postoperative symptoms could be identified. Eighty-two percent of patients were discharged 2 h and 95.6% 3 h after surgery. These patients could have been discharged earlier. After home-readiness criteria were satisfied, some patients had delayed discharge because of the unavailability of immediate escorts or the recurrence of pain. Persistent symptoms delaying discharge occurred in 4.4% of patients. Patients who underwent certain ambulatory surgical procedures, such as laparoscopy or orthopedic and general surgery, had a sixfold increased risk of developing persistent symptoms in the ambulatory surgery unit. The time to home-readiness was 2.5-fold longer and the incidence of 24-h postoperative symptoms, two- to eightfold higher in the group with persistent symptoms in the ambulatory surgery unit. In summary, periodic objective evaluation of home-readiness revealed that the majority of patients would achieve a satisfactory score on or before 2 h after surgery. The time to home-readiness by objective evaluation correlated with the type of surgery. Most delays after satisfactory home-readiness scores were reached were due to nonmedical reasons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00000539-199505000-00008

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 277

Metadata

Authors
Chung, F.
Venue
Anesthesia & Analgesia
Published
1995-05
Volume
80
Issue
5
Pages
896-902
ISSN
0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970743829
Cited by
277
References
5
FWCI
10.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recovery Pattern and Home-Readiness After Ambulatory Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000539-199505000-00008
The paper
Chung, F. (1995). Recovery Pattern and Home-Readiness After Ambulatory Surgery. Anesthesia & Analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199505000-00008

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.