Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 233

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Efficacy of Intrathecal Morphine and Clonidine in the Treatment of Pain After Spinal Cord Injury

Siddall, Philip J., Molloy, Allan R., Walker, Suellen, Mather, Laurence E., Rutkowski, Susan B., Cousins, Michael J.·2000·Anesthesia & Analgesia

Abstract

We performed a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial in 15 patients to determine the efficacy of intrathecal morphine or clonidine, alone or combined, in the treatment of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury. The combination of morphine and clonidine produced significantly more pain relief than placebo 4 h after administration; either morphine or clonidine alone did not produce as much pain relief. In addition, lumbar and cervical cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations, sampled at these levels at different times after administration were examined for a relationship between pain relief and CSF drug concentration. Lumbar CSF drug concentrations were initially several orders of magnitude larger than those in cervical CSF. After 1–2 h, the concentrations of morphine in cervical CSF markedly exceeded those of clonidine. The concentration of morphine in the cervical CSF and the degree of pain relief correlated significantly. We conclude that intrathecal administration of a mixture of clonidine and morphine is more effective than either drug administered alone and is related to the CSF-borne drug concentration above the level of spinal cord injury. If there is pathology that may restrict CSF flow, consideration should be given to intrathecal administration above the level of spinal cord damage to provide an adequate drug concentration in this region. Implications Neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury is very difficult to control adequately by using currently available techniques. We have performed a placebo-controlled, double-blinded study demonstrating that administration of a combination of morphine and clonidine into the spinal fluid can provide substantial pain relief in some people with this type of pain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00000539-200012000-00037

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 233

Metadata

Authors
Siddall, P. J., Molloy, A. R., Walker, S., Mather, L. E., Rutkowski, S. B., & Cousins, M. J.
Venue
Anesthesia & Analgesia
Published
2000-12
Volume
91
Issue
6
Pages
1493-1498
ISSN
0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091369799
Cited by
233
References
0
FWCI
10.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Efficacy of Intrathecal Morphine and Clonidine in the Treatment of Pain After Spinal Cord Injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000539-200012000-00037
The paper
Siddall, P. J., Molloy, A. R., Walker, S., Mather, L. E., Rutkowski, S. B., & Cousins, M. J. (2000). The Efficacy of Intrathecal Morphine and Clonidine in the Treatment of Pain After Spinal Cord Injury. Anesthesia & Analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200012000-00037

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.