The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Relative Risk Analysis of Factors Associated with Difficult Intubation in Obstetric Anesthesia
Abstract
Difficult tracheal intubation, often unexpected, has been identified as the commonest contributory factor to anesthetic-related maternal death. The ability to predict such cases preoperatively would be of great value. Preoperative airway assessment and potential risk factors for difficult tracheal intubation were recorded in 1,500 patients undergoing emergency and elective cesarean section under general anesthesia. Airway assessment using a modified Mallampati test recorded oropharyngeal structures visible upon maximal mouth opening. Potential risk factors documented were obesity; short neck; missing, protruding, or single maxillary incisors; receding mandible; facial edema; and swollen tongue. Subsequent to induction of anesthesia, the view at laryngoscopy and difficulty at intubation were graded. There was a significant (P less than 0.001) correlation between the oropharyngeal structures seen and both the veiw at laryngoscopy and difficulty at intubation. Univariate analysis demonstrated a significant association between difficult intubation and short neck (P less than 0.001), obesity (P less than 0.0001), missing maxillary incisors (P less than 0.02), protruding maxillary incisors (P less than 0.001), single maxillary incisor (P less than 0.0001), and receding mandible (P less than 0.003). Neither facial edema (P = 0.414) nor swollen tongue (P = 0.141) were found to be associated with difficult intubation. Multivariate analysis removed obesity and missing and single maxillary incisors as risk factors. Obesity was eliminated because of its strong association with short neck. The probability of experiencing a difficult intubation for various combinations of risk factors was determined.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Smith, I., Kranke, P., Murat, I., Smith, A., OʼSullivan, G., Sreide, E., Spies, C., & in’t Veld, B. (2011) · European Journal of Anaesthesiology · doi:10.1097/eja.0b013e3283495ba1 · Cited by 1,053
for the Canadian Airway Focus Group, Law, J. A., Broemling, N., Cooper, R. M., Drolet, P., Duggan, L. V., Griesdale, D. E., Hung, O. R., Jones, P. M., Kovacs, G., et al. (2013) · Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie · doi:10.1007/s12630-013-0019-3 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Rocke, D. A., Murray, W. B., Rout, C. C., & Gouws, E.
- Venue
- Anesthesiology
- Published
- 1992-07-01
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-73
- ISSN
- 0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968473767
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relative Risk Analysis of Factors Associated with Difficult Intubation in Obstetric Anesthesia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000542-199207000-00010
- The paper
- Rocke, D. A., Murray, W. B., Rout, C. C., & Gouws, E. (1992). Relative Risk Analysis of Factors Associated with Difficult Intubation in Obstetric Anesthesia. Anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199207000-00010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.