The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Awareness and Recall during General Anesthesia: Facts and Feelings
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Experiences of awareness and recall during general anesthesia can be most distressing for patients. To obtain relevant information, the authors systematically interviewed patients in whom awareness during surgery had occurred, and questioned them about their experiences. METHODS: Twenty-six patients, referred by colleagues, described the facts and feelings they had experienced during the period of awareness, and whether these had had any consequences. Available anesthetic records were independently judged by three experienced anesthesiologists for relevant parameters. RESULTS: Auditory perception and the sensation of paralysis were most frequently mentioned, followed by the sensation of pain. Patients' feelings were mostly related to anxiety, panic, powerlessness, and helplessness. Eighteen patients (70%) experienced unpleasant aftereffects, including sleep disturbances, dreams and nightmares, and flashbacks and anxiety during the day. Only nine patients (35%) had informed their anesthesiologists about what had taken place. Twelve anesthetic records were assessed. In three, the occurrence of awareness had been indicated, while, in a fourth, it was noted that an amnesic drug had been given at a moment of increased blood pressure. Experienced anesthesiologists were unable to reliably distinguish awareness cases from matched controls when judging the records. CONCLUSIONS: Details recalled from the period of awareness correspond with data from the literature. The anesthesiologist's role in discussing, and dealing with, traumatic experiences related to anesthesia may be of great importance. The hand-written anesthetic record is of limited value in retrospectively explaining why awareness and recall have occurred.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Myles, P., Leslie, K., McNeil, J., Forbes, A., & Chan, M. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16300-9 · Cited by 1,301
Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems
Shanks, D. R., & St. John, M. F. (1994) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00035032 · Cited by 1,163
Schelling, G., Stoll, C., Haller, M., Briegel, J., Manert, W., Hummel, T., Lenhart, A., Heyduck, M., Polasek, J., Meier, M., et al. (1998) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003246-199804000-00011 · Cited by 606
Unresponsiveness ≠ unconsciousness
Sanders, R. D., Tononi, G., Laureys, S., Sleigh, J. W., & Warner, D. S. (2012) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e318249d0a7 · Cited by 474
A Multicenter Study of Bispectral Electroencephalogram Analysis for Monitoring Anesthetic Effect
Sebel, P. S., Lang, E., Rampil, I. J., White, P. F., Cork, R., Jopling, M., Smith, N. T., Glass, P. S. A., & Manberg, P. (1997) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1097/00000539-199704000-00035 · Cited by 422
Metadata
- Authors
- Moerman, N., Bonke, B., & Oosting, J.
- Venue
- Anesthesiology
- Published
- 1993-09-01
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 454-464
- ISSN
- 0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122089391
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Awareness and Recall during General Anesthesia: Facts and Feelings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000542-199309000-00007
- The paper
- Moerman, N., Bonke, B., & Oosting, J. (1993). Awareness and Recall during General Anesthesia: Facts and Feelings. Anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199309000-00007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.