The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stereoselective Effects of Etomidate Optical Isomers on Gamma-aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptors and Animals
Open accessAbstract
Background: The intravenous anesthetic etomidate is optically active and exists in two mirror-image enantiomeric forms. However, although the R(+) isomer is used as a clinical anesthetic, quantitative information on the relative potencies of the R(+) and S(-) isomers is lacking. These data could be used to test the relevance of putative molecular targets. Methods: The anesthetic concentrations for a half-maximal effect (EC50) needed to induce a loss of righting reflex in tadpoles (Rana temporaria) were determined for both etomidate enantiomers. The effects of the isomers on gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-induced currents in stably transfected mouse fibroblast cells was also investigated using the patch-clamp technique. In addition, the effects of the isomers on a lipid chain-melting phase transition were determined. Results: The EC50 concentrations for general anesthesia for the R(+) and S(-) isomers were 3.4 +/- 0.1 microM and 57 +/- 1 microM, with slopes of n = 1.9 +/- 0.1 and n = 2.9 +/- 0.2, respectively. The R(+) isomer was also much more effective than the S(-) isomer at potentiating GABA-induced currents, although the degree of stereoselectivity varied with anesthetic concentration. R(+) etomidate potentiated the GABA-induced currents by increasing the apparent affinity of GABA for its receptor. Both isomers were equally effective at disrupting lipid bilayers. Conclusions: These data are consistent with the idea that the GABA(A) receptor plays a central role in the actions of etomidate. Etomidate exerts its effects on the receptor by binding directly to a specific site or sites on the protein and allosterically enhancing the apparent affinity of GABA for its receptor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
General anaesthesia: from molecular targets to neuronal pathways of sleep and arousal
Franks, N. P. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2372 · Cited by 1,295
Self-citationJurd, R., Arrasa, M., Lambert, S., Drexler, B., Siegwart, R., Crestani, F., Zaugg, M., Vogt, K. E., Ledermann, B., Antkowiak, B., et al. (2003) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.02-0611fje · Cited by 558
Emerging molecular mechanisms of general anesthetic action
Hemmings, H. C., Akabas, M. H., Goldstein, P. A., Trudell, J. R., Orser, B. A., & Harrison, N. L. (2005) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2005.08.006 · Cited by 552
Drug interactions at GABAA receptors
Korpi, E. R., Gründer, G., & Lüddens, H. (2002) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(02)00013-8 · Cited by 473
General anaesthetic actions on ligand-gated ion channels
Krasowski, M. D., & Harrison, N. L. (1999) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (CMLS) · doi:10.1007/s000180050371 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Tomlin, S. L., Jenkins, A., Lieb, W. R., & Franks, N. P.
- Venue
- Anesthesiology
- Published
- 1998-03-01
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 708-717
- ISSN
- 0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012452565
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stereoselective Effects of Etomidate Optical Isomers on Gamma-aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptors and Animals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000542-199803000-00022
- The paper
- Tomlin, S. L., Jenkins, A., Lieb, W. R., & Franks, N. P. (1998). Stereoselective Effects of Etomidate Optical Isomers on Gamma-aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptors and Animals. Anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199803000-00022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.