Cited by 2,121Nausea and vomiting managementAnesthesia and Pain ManagementEnhanced Recovery After Surgery

A Simplified Risk Score for Predicting Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: Conclusions from Cross-validations between Two Centers

Apfel, Christian C., Läärä, Esa, Koivuranta, Merja, Greim, Clemens-A., Roewer, Norbert·1999·Anesthesiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, two centers have independently developed a risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). This study investigated (1) whether risk scores are valid across centers and (2) whether risk scores based on logistic regression coefficients can be simplified without loss of discriminating power. METHODS: Adult patients from two centers (Oulu, Finland: n = 520, and Wuerzburg, Germany: n = 2202) received inhalational anesthesia (without antiemetic prophylaxis) for various types of surgery. PONV was defined as nausea or vomiting within 24 h of surgery. Risk scores to estimate the probability of PONV were obtained by fitting logistic regression models. Simplified risk scores were constructed based on the number of risk factors that were found significant in the logistic regression analyses. Original and simplified scores were cross-validated. A combined data set was created to estimate a potential center effect and to construct a final risk score. The discriminating power of each score was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Risk scores derived from one center were able to predict PONV from the other center (area under the curve = 0.65-0.75). Simplification did not essentially weaken the discriminating power (area under the curve = 0.63-0.73). No center effect could be detected in a combined data set (odds ratio = 1.06, 95% confidence interval = 0.71-1.59). The final score consisted of four predictors: female gender, history of motion sickness (MS) or PONV, nonsmoking, and the use of postoperative opioids. If none, one, two, three, or four of these risk factors were present, the incidences of PONV were 10%, 21%, 39%, 61% and 79%. CONCLUSIONS: The risk scores derived from one center proved valid in the other and could be simplified without significant loss of discriminating power. Therefore, it appears that this risk score has broad applicability in predicting PONV in adult patients undergoing inhalational anesthesia for various types of surgery. For patients with at least two out of these four identified predictors a prophylactic antiemetic strategy should be considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00000542-199909000-00022

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Volatile anesthetics and intraoperative opioids activate the chemoreceptor trigger zone, thereby increasing the emetogenic load compared with awake or purely local techniques.

    “Volatile anesthetics and intraoperative opioids activate the chemoreceptor trigger zone, thereby increasing the emetogenic load compared with awake or purely local techniques.26,27”
  • No irreversible neurovascular or infectious events were documented after more than 200 regional blocks.

    “Hyoscine’s anticholinergic sequelae (blurred vision, dizziness, transient bradycardia) were short-lived, and no irreversible neurovascular or infectious events were documented after more than 200 regional blocks, underscoring the favorable safety profile of both strategies.19,26”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 2,121

Authors
Apfel, C. C., Läärä, E., Koivuranta, M., Greim, C.-A., & Roewer, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
  • University of Oulu (FI)
Venue
Anesthesiology
Published
1999-09-01
Volume
91
Issue
3
Pages
693-693
ISSN
0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027206415
Cited by
2,121
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 130 · 2025: 126 · 2024: 112 · 2023: 110 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 115 · 2020: 144 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 78 · 2017: 94 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 92 · 2014: 87 · 2013: 90 · 2012: 78
FWCI
23.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anesthesiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nausea and vomiting management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Keywords
postoperative nausea and vomiting, risk score, inhalational anesthesia, antiemetic prophylaxis, center effects, female gender, motion sickness, postoperative opioids, logistic regression, discriminatory power
MeSH terms
Adult, Analgesics, Opioid, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Logistic Models, Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review