Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multifactorial Preoperative Predictors for Postcesarean Section Pain and Analgesic Requirement

Open access
Pan, Peter H., Coghill, Robert, Houle, Timothy T., Seid, Melvin H., Lindel, W Michael, Parker, R Lamar, Washburn, Scott A., Harris, Lynne, Eisenach, James C.·2006·Anesthesiology

Abstract

Background: The study aimed to determine predictive factors for postcesarean pain and analgesia using an assessment of pain threshold and suprathreshold thermal stimuli as well as degree of somatization and anxiety. Methods: Thirty-four healthy parturients scheduled for cesarean delivery under subarachnoid anesthesia were enrolled. Preoperative thermal pain threshold, intensity, and unpleasantness to heat stimuli applied to arm and lower back, State Trait Anxiety Inventory, and patient expectation for postoperative pain and need for analgesia were assessed. After surgery, overall, resting, and movement pain and analgesic consumption were recorded. Prediction of pain and analgesic use outcomes was made by principal component factor analysis, followed by stepwise linear regression. Results: Resting pain was predicted by two factors, thermal pain and unpleasantness and patient expectation (r2 = 0.26, P < 0.01), evoked pain by thermal pain threshold in the back (r2= 0.20, P < 0.009), composite pain by thermal pain and unpleasantness and preoperative blood pressure (r2 = 0.28, P < 0.008), intraoperative analgesic need by preexisting pain (r2 = 0.22, P < 0.006), recovery room analgesia by thermal pain threshold and State Trait Anxiety Inventory (r2 = 0.27, P < 0.01), and total analgesic need by State Trait Anxiety Inventory (r2 = 0.22, P < 0.01). These models predicted the upper twentieth percentile of composite pain scores and analgesic requirement with sensitivity of 0.71 to 0.80 and specificity of 0.76 to 0.80. Conclusions: The authors' results suggest a meaningful combination of preoperative patient responses from physical and psychological tests yields a valid multifactorial predictive model for postoperative pain and analgesic requirement with significant improvements over individual predictive variables.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00000542-200603000-00007

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Pan, P. H., Coghill, R., Houle, T. T., Seid, M. H., Lindel, W. M., Parker, R. L., Washburn, S. A., Harris, L., & Eisenach, J. C.
Venue
Anesthesiology
Published
2006-03-01
Volume
104
Issue
3
Pages
417-425
ISSN
0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150927826
Cited by
264
References
24
FWCI
15.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multifactorial Preoperative Predictors for Postcesarean Section Pain and Analgesic Requirement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000542-200603000-00007
The paper
Pan, P. H., Coghill, R., Houle, T. T., Seid, M. H., Lindel, W. M., Parker, R. L., Washburn, S. A., Harris, L., & Eisenach, J. C. (2006). Multifactorial Preoperative Predictors for Postcesarean Section Pain and Analgesic Requirement. Anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200603000-00007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.