The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multifactorial Preoperative Predictors for Postcesarean Section Pain and Analgesic Requirement
Open accessAbstract
Background: The study aimed to determine predictive factors for postcesarean pain and analgesia using an assessment of pain threshold and suprathreshold thermal stimuli as well as degree of somatization and anxiety. Methods: Thirty-four healthy parturients scheduled for cesarean delivery under subarachnoid anesthesia were enrolled. Preoperative thermal pain threshold, intensity, and unpleasantness to heat stimuli applied to arm and lower back, State Trait Anxiety Inventory, and patient expectation for postoperative pain and need for analgesia were assessed. After surgery, overall, resting, and movement pain and analgesic consumption were recorded. Prediction of pain and analgesic use outcomes was made by principal component factor analysis, followed by stepwise linear regression. Results: Resting pain was predicted by two factors, thermal pain and unpleasantness and patient expectation (r2 = 0.26, P < 0.01), evoked pain by thermal pain threshold in the back (r2= 0.20, P < 0.009), composite pain by thermal pain and unpleasantness and preoperative blood pressure (r2 = 0.28, P < 0.008), intraoperative analgesic need by preexisting pain (r2 = 0.22, P < 0.006), recovery room analgesia by thermal pain threshold and State Trait Anxiety Inventory (r2 = 0.27, P < 0.01), and total analgesic need by State Trait Anxiety Inventory (r2 = 0.22, P < 0.01). These models predicted the upper twentieth percentile of composite pain scores and analgesic requirement with sensitivity of 0.71 to 0.80 and specificity of 0.76 to 0.80. Conclusions: The authors' results suggest a meaningful combination of preoperative patient responses from physical and psychological tests yields a valid multifactorial predictive model for postoperative pain and analgesic requirement with significant improvements over individual predictive variables.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain
Price, D. D., McGrath, P. A., Rafii, A., & Buckingham, B. (1983) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(83)90126-4 · Cited by 3,921
Chronic Pain as an Outcome of Surgery: A Review of Predictive Factors
Perkins, F. M., & Kehlet, H. (2000) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-200010000-00038 · Cited by 1,341
The subjective experience of pain: where expectations become reality
Koyama, T., McHaffie, J. G., Laurienti, P. J., & Coghill, R. C. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0408576102 · Cited by 747
Self-citationEffectiveness of acute postoperative pain management: I. Evidence from published data
Dolin, S. J., Cashman, J. N., & Bland, J. M. (2002) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/89.3.409 · Cited by 737
Characteristics and prediction of early pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Bisgaard, T., Klarskov, B., Rosenberg, J., & Kehlet, H. (2001) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00406-1 · Cited by 486
Prospective study of chronic pain after groin hernia repair
Callesen, T., Bech, K., & Kehlet, H. (1999) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01320.x · Cited by 394
Influence of psychological factors on postoperative pain, mood and analgesic requirements
Taenzer, P., Melzack, R., & Jeans, M. E. (1986) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(86)90119-3 · Cited by 379
Age is the best predictor of postoperative morphine requirements
Macintyre, P. E., & Jarvis, D. A. (1996) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(95)00128-x · Cited by 305
Postcesarean Section Pain Prediction by Preoperative Experimental Pain Assessment
Granot, M., Lowenstein, L., Yarnitsky, D., Tamir, A., & Zimmer, E. Z. (2003) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-200306000-00018 · Cited by 248
Aubrun, F., Langeron, O., Quesnel, C., Coriat, P., & Riou, B. (2003) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-200306000-00017 · Cited by 243
Cited by
Predictors of Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Consumption: A Qualitative Systematic Review
Ip, H. Y. V., Abrishami, A., Peng, P. W. H., Wong, J., & Chung, F. (2009) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e3181aae87a · Cited by 1,055
Prediction of chronic post-operative pain: Pre-operative DNIC testing identifies patients at risk
Yarnitsky, D., Crispel, Y., Eisenberg, E., Granovsky, Y., Ben-Nun, A., Sprecher, E., Best, L.-A., & Granot, M. (2008) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2007.10.033 · Cited by 750
Yarnitsky, D. (2010) · Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aco.0b013e32833c348b · Cited by 745
Chapman, C. R., & Vierck, C. J. (2017) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2016.11.004 · Cited by 423
Predictive Risk Factors for Persistent Postherniotomy Pain
Aasvang, E. K., Gmaehle, E., Hansen, J. B., Gmaehle, B., Forman, J. L., Schwarz, J., Bittner, R., & Kehlet, H. (2010) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e3181d31ff8 · Cited by 412
Metadata
- Authors
- Pan, P. H., Coghill, R., Houle, T. T., Seid, M. H., Lindel, W. M., Parker, R. L., Washburn, S. A., Harris, L., & Eisenach, J. C.
- Venue
- Anesthesiology
- Published
- 2006-03-01
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 417-425
- ISSN
- 0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2150927826
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 15.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multifactorial Preoperative Predictors for Postcesarean Section Pain and Analgesic Requirement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000542-200603000-00007
- The paper
- Pan, P. H., Coghill, R., Houle, T. T., Seid, M. H., Lindel, W. M., Parker, R. L., Washburn, S. A., Harris, L., & Eisenach, J. C. (2006). Multifactorial Preoperative Predictors for Postcesarean Section Pain and Analgesic Requirement. Anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200603000-00007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.