The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Molding Therapy for Infants with Deformational Auricular Anomalies
Abstract
Congenital auricular anomalies can be categorized as either malformed or deformational. Auricular deformations most commonly affect the helix and antehelix. Surgical correction involves sutural modeling, wedge excision, reshaping and reversing cartilage segments, and morselization. Since neonatal auricular cartilage is extremely pliable, we used early splinting to correct deformational ear anomalies. Splints were constructed of leadfree, soft soldering wire threaded into polyethylene tubing and held in place with Steri-Strips. From August 1995 through February 1996 we treated 19 infants with 32 deformed auricles: 10 infants were male and 9 were female, ranging in age from 1 day to 10 weeks. Thirteen infants had both ears affected. There were 8 prominent ears, 23 lop ears, 2 Stahl's ears, and 1 infant with an inverted concha. For prominent ears, the helical-mastoid distance decreased from an average of 16.8 to 12.2 mm, after an average of 13 weeks of splinting. Fourteen corrected lop ears had a normal appearance, and 9 were improved with minor residual deformity. There was only one complication: skin irritation requiring adjustment of the prosthesis. Five children had molding started after 3 months of age and all had no significant improvement. In addition, the parents of 5 children refused therapy and 12 children had either poor compliance to therapy or were lost to follow-up. Our experience with auricular molding confirmed that it is easy, effective, and inexpensive. If molded sufficiently early, most auricular deformations should not need surgical correction in childhood.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Congenital auricle abnormalities are classified into two major categories: malformations and deformations.”
From Using Ear Molding to Treat Congenital Auricular Deformities (2021) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“Auricle deformations are characterized by a fully developed pinna without missing skin or cartilage (1, 2).”
From Using Ear Molding to Treat Congenital Auricular Deformities (2021) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“Tan et al. believed that non-invasive correction within 3 months of birth had an ideal effect, and that treatment timing was closely related to the duration of the curative effects (2).”
From Using Ear Molding to Treat Congenital Auricular Deformities (2021) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“Early diagnosis and treatment have been advised in earlier literature.24,41,42 Multiple articles in our review have echoed this.”
From Non-surgical Correction of Congenital Ear Anomalies: A Review of the Literature (2020) · cites this paper as [41]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ear Molding in Newborn Infants with Auricular Deformities
Byrd, H. S., Langevin, C.-J., & Ghidoni, L. A. (2010) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e3181e617bb · Cited by 178
“Results: The types of deformities managed, and their relative occurrence, are as follows: (1) prominent/cup ear, 373 ears (45 percent); (2) lidding/lop ear, 224 ears (27 percent); (3) mixed ear deformities, 83 ears (10 percent) (all had associated conchal crus); (4) Stahl’s ear, 66 ears (8 percent); (5) helical rim ab…”
Janis, J. E., Rohrich, R. J., & Gutowski, K. A. (2005) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000156218.93855.c9 · Cited by 159
Porter, C. J. W., & Tan, S. T. (2005) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000161454.08384.0a · Cited by 152
Self-citationThe postauricular fascial flap as an adjunct to Mustardé and Furnas type otoplasty.
Horlock, N., Misra, A., & Gault, D. T. (2001) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-200111000-00005 · Cited by 102
The Newborn Butterfly Project: A Shortened Treatment Protocol for Ear Molding
Doft, M. A., Goodkind, A. B., Diamond, S., DiPace, J. I., Kacker, A., & LaBruna, A. N. (2015) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000000999 · Cited by 93
“of ears 158 (100) Sex Male (total ears) 85 (54) Female (total ears) 73 (46) First born Yes 96 (61) No 62 (39) Ears Bilateral 62 (65) Left 24 (25) Right 10 (10) Age at placement <1 wk 130 (82) <2 wk 20 (13) 2–6 wk 8 (5) Family history Yes 14 (9) No 144 (91) Baby comorbidities Hip dysplasia 2 (1) Tethered tongue 2 (1) O…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Tan, S. T., Abramson, D. L., MacDonald, D. M., & Mulliken, J. B.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Annals of Plastic Surgery
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 263-268
- ISSN
- 0148-7043 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2016167543
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics (clinical) › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- prominent ears, lop ear, auricular cartilage, infants, conservative treatment, ear deformity
- MeSH terms
- Ear, External, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Splints, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review