Cited by 35Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular TechniquesEar and Head Tumors

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Anatomy of the Postauricular Island “Revolving Door” Flap (“Flip-Flop” Flap)

Abstract

Reconstruction following resection of auricular (cavum conchae) lesions may be done with a retroauricular rotation flap. Recently there has been revived interest in this elegant reconstructive procedure. Although the vascular anatomy of the area was studied, no direct study of flap anatomy was reported. Six fresh adult male cadaveric dissections of the retroauricular area were performed. The skin and underlying subcutaneous tissue layer were reflected to correspond with flap size, and anatomic structures were studied. Dissection was carried out on 12 ears. The origin of the occipital belly of the occipitofrontalis muscle arising from the posterior mastoid region was identified in four patients and only as part of the fascial layer overlying the posterior mastoid region. Only a small portion of the sternocleidomastoid tendon at best is possibly incorporated in the flap. It seems that only a negligible contribution to the flap is derived from the temporalis muscle. The posterior auricular muscle was identified in all patients and its origin from the skull was (in all patients) included or bordered the posterior flap region. The posterior auricular artery (PAA) was seen in all 12 dissections. The artery was adjacent to the styloid process medial to the parotid gland superficially between the auricular cartilage and the mastoid process. The PAA was then found on the periosteum of the mastoid process, ascending deep to the posterior auricular muscle. The flap seems to be a truly fasciocutaneous flap with small, questionable, superior and anteroinferior muscular contributions, and an inclusion of the rather small posterior auricular muscle. As reported in other studies, blood supply to the area seems to be derived from the PAA.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00000637-199712000-00008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The RD flap's modification and extended utility for scapha, helix, antihelix, external auditory meatus, and larger auricular defects have been described earlier.

    “However, its modification and extended utility for scapha, helix and antihelix, external auditory meatus, 3 11 and larger auricular defect has been described earlier by Talmi, 7 Rodendo, and Jackson. 12 13 14 15”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Talmi, Y. P., Liokumovitch, P., Wolf, M., Horowitz, Z., Kopolovitch, J., & Kronenberg, J.
Affiliations
Sheba Medical Center (IL)
Venue
Annals of Plastic Surgery
Published
1997-12
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
603-607
ISSN
0148-7043 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061033641
Cited by
35
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Ear and Head Tumors
Keywords
ear reconstruction, posterior auricular artery, vascular anatomy, fasciocutaneous flap, cadaveric dissection
MeSH terms
Adult, Cadaver, Ear, External, Humans, Male, Muscles, Surgical Flaps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review