Cited by 17Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular TechniquesBreast Implant and Reconstruction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pull-Through Subcutaneous Pedicle Flap for an Anterior Auricular Defect

NGUYEN, DENNIS H., BORDEAUX, JEREMY S.·2010·Dermatologic Surgery

Abstract

Log in or Register Subscribe to journalSubscribe Get new issue alertsGet alerts Enter your Email address: Wolters Kluwer Health may email you for journal alerts and information, but is committed to maintaining your privacy and will not share your personal information without your express consent. For more information, please refer to our Privacy Policy. Subscribe to eTOC Secondary Logo Journal Logo All Articles Images Videos Podcasts Blogs Advanced Search Toggle navigation Subscribe Register Login Articles & Issues Current IssuePrevious IssuesPublished Ahead-of-PrintSpecial Issues Collections Advancement FlapCartilage GraphCompsite GraphEar ReconstructionEyelid ReconstructionFull Thickness Skin GraphInterpolation FlapLip ReconstructionNasal ALANasal ReconstructionNasal Tip - SidewallPull Through FlapRotation FlapSkin Cancer AwarenessSoft TriangleTransposistion Flap VideosPodcastFor Authors Submit a ManuscriptInformation for AuthorsLanguage Editing ServicesAuthor Permissions Journal Info About the JournalEditorial BoardAbout the societyAdvertisingSubscription ServicesReprintsOpen AccessRights and PermissionsNZSCM Member Info All Articles Images Videos Podcasts Blogs Advanced Search

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01575.x

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Primary closure, secondary healing, skin grafting, and other local flaps are suboptimal for covering exposed cartilage or composite defects involving anterior skin and cartilage.

    “Although, primary closure, secondary healing, skin grafting, and other local flaps are options for resurfacing an anterior auricular defect, they are suboptimal for covering exposed cartilage or composite defects involving anterior skin and cartilage. 5 6 16”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
NGUYEN, D. H., & BORDEAUX, J. S.
Affiliations
University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
Corresponding author
  • NGUYEN, DENNIS H.
  • BORDEAUX, JEREMY S.
Venue
Dermatologic Surgery
Published
2010-06
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
945-949
ISSN
1076-0512 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116341594
Cited by
17
References
9
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Dermatologic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Keywords
ear reconstruction, pedicled flap, auricle
MeSH terms
Basal Cell Carcinoma, Ear Deformities, Acquired, Ear Neoplasms, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Skin Neoplasms, Surgical Flaps, Mohs Surgery, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Ear Auricle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review