Cited by 55Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Another Solution for the Problem of the Prominent Ear

Open access
CRIKELAIR, GEORGE F., COSMAN, BARD·1964·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Presbyterian Hospital and College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00000658-196408000-00021

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
CRIKELAIR, G. F., & COSMAN, B.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
1964-08
Volume
160
Issue
2
Pages
314-324
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052718811
Cited by
55
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics (clinical) › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Keywords
prominent ears, otoplasty, ear deformity
MeSH terms
Cartilage, Child, Ear Deformities, Acquired, Ear, External, Humans, Neck, Plastics, Postoperative Complications, Surgery, Plastic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review