Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 536

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Venous Bypass in Clinical Liver Transplantation

Open access
SHAW, BYERS W., MARTIN, DOUGLAS J., MARQUEZ, JOSE M., KANG, Y. G., BUGBEE, ALAN C., IWATSUKI, SHUNZABURO, GRIFFITH, BARTLEY P., HARDESTY, ROBERT L., BAHNSON, HENRY T., STARZL, THOMAS E.·1984·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

A venous bypass technique (BP) that does not require the use of systemic anticoagulation is used routinely at our institution in all adult patients during the anhepatic phase of liver transplantation (LT). Complete cardiopulmonary profiles were obtained in a subset of 28 consecutive cases. During the anhepatic phase while on bypass, mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, and pulmonary arterial wedge pressure were maintained at prehepatectomy levels. Oxygen consumption fell secondary to a decrease in temperature and the removal of the liver. Consequently, cardiac index fell without an increase in arterial-venous O2 content difference, reflecting adequate tissue oxygenation. Compared with 63 patients in a previous series given LT without bypass (NBP), the 57 total BP patients experienced better postoperative renal function (p less than 0.001), required less blood use during surgery (p less than 0.01), and had better survival 30 days after LT. The equivalency of 90-day survival in these groups results from the lack of effect of BP on the long-term survival of patients considered at high risk for metabolic reasons. BP patients at high risk for technical considerations, however, survived LT whereas NBP patients did not. BP offers other advantages important in establishing LT as a service-oriented procedure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00000658-198410000-00013

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 536

Metadata

Authors
SHAW, B. W., MARTIN, D. J., MARQUEZ, J. M., KANG, Y. G., BUGBEE, A. C., IWATSUKI, S., GRIFFITH, B. P., HARDESTY, R. L., BAHNSON, H. T., & STARZL, T. E.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
1984-10
Volume
200
Issue
4
Pages
524-532
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971441603
Cited by
536
References
8
FWCI
24.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Venous Bypass in Clinical Liver Transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000658-198410000-00013
The paper
SHAW, B. W., MARTIN, D. J., MARQUEZ, J. M., KANG, Y. G., BUGBEE, A. C., IWATSUKI, S., GRIFFITH, B. P., HARDESTY, R. L., BAHNSON, H. T., & STARZL, T. E. (1984). Venous Bypass in Clinical Liver Transplantation. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198410000-00013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.