The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Postoperative Adjuvant Chemoradiation Improves Survival: A Prospective, Single-Institution Experience
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate prospectively survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, comparing two different postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation protocol to those of no adjuvant therapy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Based on limited data from the Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group, adjuvant chemoradiation therapy has been recommended after pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the head, neck, or uncinate process of the pancrease. However, many patients continue to receive no such therapy. METHODS: From October 1991 through September 1995, all patients with resected, pathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the head, neck, or uncinate process of the pancreas were reviewed by a multidisciplinary group (surgery, radiation oncology, medical oncology, and pathology) and were offered three options for postoperative treatment after pancreaticoduodenectomy: 1) standard therapy: external beam radiation therapy to the pancreatic bed (4000-4500 cGy) given with two 3-day fluorouracil (5-FU) courses and followed by weekly bolus 5-FU (500 mg/m2 per day) for 4 months; 2) intensive therapy: external beam radiation therapy to the pancreatic bed (5040-5760 cGy) with prophylactic hepatic irradiation (2340-2700 cGy) given with and followed by infusional 5-FU (200 mg/m2 per day) plus leucovorin (5 mg/m2 per day) for 5 of 7 days for 4 months; or 3) no therapy: no postoperative radiation therapy or chemotherapy. RESULTS: Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in 174 patients, with 1 in-hospital death (0.6%). Ninety-nine patients elected standard therapy, 21 elected intensive therapy, and 53 patients declined therapy. The three groups were comparable with respect to race, gender, intraoperative blood loss, tumor differentiation, lymph node status, tumor diameter, and resection margin status. Univariate analyses indicated that tumor diameter < 3 cm, intraoperative blood loss < 700 mL, absence of intraoperative blood transfusions, and use of adjuvant chemoradiation therapy were associated with significantly longer survival (p < 0.05). By Cox proportional hazards survival analysis, the most powerful predictors of outcome were tumor diameter, intraoperative blood loss, status of resection margins, and use of postoperative adjuvant therapy. The use of postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation therapy was a predictor of improved survival (median survival, 19.5 months compared to 13.5 months without therapy; p = 0.003). The intensive therapy group had no survival advantage when compared to that of the standard therapy group (median survival, 17.5 months vs. 21 months, p = not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemoradiation therapy significantly improves survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the head, neck, or uncinate process of the pancreas. Based on these survival data, standard adjuvant chemoradiation therapy appears to be indicated for patients treated by pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the head, neck, or uncinate process of the pancreas. Intensive therapy conferred no survival advantage over standard therapy in this analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Cited by
Jaffee, E. M., Hruban, R. H., Biedrzycki, B., Laheru, D., Schepers, K., Sauter, P. R., Goemann, M., Coleman, J., Grochow, L., Donehower, R. C., et al. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2001.19.1.145 · Cited by 600
Self-citationLim, J. E., Chien, M. W., & Earle, C. C. (2003) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-200301000-00011 · Cited by 586
SMAD4 Gene Mutations Are Associated with Poor Prognosis in Pancreatic Cancer
Blackford, A., Serrano, O. K., Wolfgang, C. L., Parmigiani, G., Jones, S., Zhang, X., Parsons, D. W., Lin, J. C.-H., Leary, R. J., Eshleman, J. R., et al. (2009) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-0227 · Cited by 371
Self-citationHerman, J. M., Swartz, M. J., Hsu, C. C., Winter, J., Pawlik, T. M., Sugar, E., Robinson, R., Laheru, D. A., Jaffee, E., Hruban, R. H., et al. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.15.8469 · Cited by 375
Self-citationPhase-II study on stereotactic radiotherapy of locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma
Hoyer, M., Roed, H., Sengelov, L., Traberg, A., Ohlhuis, L., Pedersen, J., Nellemann, H., Kiil Berthelsen, A., Eberholst, F., Engelholm, S. A., et al. (2005) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2004.12.022 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Yeo, C. J., Abrams, R. A., Grochow, L. B., Sohn, T. A., Ord, S. E., Hruban, R. H., Zahurak, M. L., Dooley, W. C., Coleman, J., Sauter, P. K., Pitt, H. A., Lillemoe, K. D., & Cameron, J. L.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 225
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 621-636
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075244358
- Cited by
- 595
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Postoperative Adjuvant Chemoradiation Improves Survival: A Prospective, Single-Institution Experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000658-199705000-00018
- The paper
- Yeo, C. J., Abrams, R. A., Grochow, L. B., Sohn, T. A., Ord, S. E., Hruban, R. H., Zahurak, M. L., Dooley, W. C., Coleman, J., Sauter, P. K., Pitt, H. A., Lillemoe, K. D., & Cameron, J. L. (1997). Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Postoperative Adjuvant Chemoradiation Improves Survival: A Prospective, Single-Institution Experience. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199705000-00018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.